Archive RPC needed: 12 stuck IBC orphan send_packet events at h<41M (osmosis-1 channel-232 → AssetMantle channel-0)

[deepanshutr]

Need: archive tx-index for h<41M to recover 12 stuck IBC orphan packets

We've recovered 335/347 orphan packets on the AssetMantle ↔ Osmosis IBC channel (channel-0/channel-232). The last 12 are stuck because their original send_packet events live below every probed public Osmosis RPC's tx-index horizon.

Probed endpoints' earliest tx-index

Endpoint	earliest tx-index
rpc-osmosis.freshstaking.com:31657	41,066,117
rpc.lavenderfive.com:443/osmosis	~41,000,000
rpc.osmosis.zone	57,510,159
osmosis-rpc.publicnode.com	58,779,971
osmosis-rpc.polkachu.com	58,253,324
osmosis.api.pocket.network	57,165,678
rpc.osmosis.validatus.com	57,214,704

(Note: freshstaking advertises earliest_block_height=0 in /status, but block_results?height=37000000 returns "lowest height is 41066117". State-archive vs tx-index pruning differ.)

What we need

For each of these osmosis-1 channel-232 sequences, the send_packet event JSON:

51441, 52117, 52118, 52119, 52120, 52121, 52122, 52123, 52124, 52125, 52126, 52127

Either:

1. A public Osmosis RPC whose tx-index actually goes back to 2024, or
2. A community member running an archive who can tx_search the above seqs and paste the result, or
3. Pointer to a partial archive snapshot that keeps tx-index for 2024

Example query:

curl 'https://YOUR_ARCHIVE_RPC/tx_search?query=%22send_packet.packet_src_channel%3D%27channel-232%27%20AND%20send_packet.packet_sequence%3D%2751441%27%22'

Tooling

Once we have the events, the mock-RPC + hermes timeout pipeline at https://github.com/deepanshutr/mantle-osmo-hermes-relayer/tree/main/scripts/orphan-recovery refunds the original osmo senders in a single batch tx (no funds need to move from the recovery operator). Documented full reproduction including the breakthrough that IBC packet commitments persist on src until ack/timeout, so proofs come from current state rather than archive state.

Tracking issue: deepanshutr/mantle-osmo-hermes-relayer#1

Thanks!