-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
threat modeling
The Threat Modeling Engine is a comprehensive component of the AI threat analysis system that implements advanced threat modeling methodologies including STRIDE analysis, attack tree generation, and threat actor profiling. This engine transforms discovered MCP tool capabilities into structured threat models that security teams can use to understand and defend against potential attacks.
classDiagram
class ThreatModeler {
+perform_stride_analysis()
+generate_attack_trees()
+profile_threat_actors()
+conduct_comprehensive_analysis()
-_initialize_stride_patterns()
-_initialize_threat_actor_templates()
-_initialize_attack_patterns()
}
class AttackVectorGenerator {
+generate_attack_vectors()
-_get_function_risk_indicators()
-_generate_vectors_for_indicator()
-_prioritize_attack_vectors()
}
class ScenarioBuilder {
+build_attack_scenarios()
+analyze_threat_actor_scenarios()
-_select_scenario_template()
-_build_detailed_scenario()
-_calculate_scenario_risk()
}
class AttackChainAnalyzer {
+identify_attack_chains()
+assess_chain_feasibility()
-_build_capability_graph()
-_find_attack_paths()
-_rank_attack_chains()
}
class LikelihoodAssessor {
+assess_threat_likelihood()
+create_threat_matrix()
-_analyze_environmental_factors()
-_calculate_threat_probability()
}
class MCPCapabilityAnalyzer {
+map_capabilities_to_threats()
+categorize_threat_potential()
-_map_to_attack_techniques()
-_generate_threat_scenarios()
}
ThreatModeler --> AttackVectorGenerator
ThreatModeler --> ScenarioBuilder
ThreatModeler --> AttackChainAnalyzer
ThreatModeler --> LikelihoodAssessor
ThreatModeler --> MCPCapabilityAnalyzer
class STRIDECategory {
<<enumeration>>
+SPOOFING
+TAMPERING
+REPUDIATION
+INFORMATION_DISCLOSURE
+DENIAL_OF_SERVICE
+ELEVATION_OF_PRIVILEGE
}
class AttackTreeNodeType {
<<enumeration>>
+GOAL
+AND
+OR
+LEAF
}
class ThreatActorType {
<<enumeration>>
+INSIDER_THREAT
+EXTERNAL_ATTACKER
+SUPPLY_CHAIN
+NATION_STATE
+CYBERCRIMINAL
+HACKTIVIST
}
flowchart TD
A[Tool Capabilities] --> B[ThreatModeler]
C[Environment Context] --> B
B --> D[STRIDE Analysis]
B --> E[Attack Tree Generation]
B --> F[Threat Actor Profiling]
D --> G[STRIDEThreat Objects]
E --> H[AttackTree Objects]
F --> I[ThreatActorProfile Objects]
G --> J[ThreatModelingResult]
H --> J
I --> J
K[AttackVectorGenerator] --> L[Attack Vectors]
M[ScenarioBuilder] --> N[Abuse Scenarios]
O[AttackChainAnalyzer] --> P[Attack Chains]
Q[LikelihoodAssessor] --> R[Probability Matrix]
L --> J
N --> J
P --> J
R --> J
J --> S[Comprehensive Threat Model]
The STRIDE analysis engine implements Microsoft's STRIDE methodology for systematic threat identification:
- Spoofing: Identity impersonation attacks
- Tampering: Data/system modification attacks
- Repudiation: Non-accountability attacks
- Information Disclosure: Privacy violation attacks
- Denial of Service: Availability attacks
- Elevation of Privilege: Authorization bypass attacks
def perform_stride_analysis(
self,
tool_capabilities: ToolCapabilities,
environment_context: EnvironmentContext
) -> List[STRIDEThreat]:
"""
Perform comprehensive STRIDE analysis on MCP tool capabilities.
Process:
1. Iterate through each STRIDE category
2. Analyze tool capabilities against category patterns
3. Generate specific threats for each applicable category
4. Calculate severity and likelihood scores
5. Prioritize threats by risk level
"""The engine uses pattern-based threat identification:
stride_patterns = {
STRIDECategory.SPOOFING: {
"indicators": ["authentication", "identity", "credentials"],
"threat_templates": [
"Authentication bypass using {tool_name}",
"Identity spoofing through {capability}",
"Credential impersonation via {function}"
]
},
STRIDECategory.TAMPERING: {
"indicators": ["write", "modify", "update", "delete"],
"threat_templates": [
"Data modification through {tool_name}",
"System configuration tampering",
"File system manipulation"
]
}
# ... additional categories
}Attack trees provide hierarchical representations of attack paths:
graph TD
A[Root Goal: Data Exfiltration] --> B[AND: Gain Access]
A --> C[AND: Extract Data]
B --> D[OR: Exploit Authentication]
B --> E[OR: Bypass Authorization]
D --> F[Credential Brute Force]
D --> G[Session Hijacking]
E --> H[Privilege Escalation]
E --> I[Token Manipulation]
C --> J[File System Access]
C --> K[Database Queries]
C --> L[API Exploitation]
def generate_attack_trees(
self,
tool_capabilities: ToolCapabilities,
environment_context: EnvironmentContext,
target_goals: Optional[List[str]] = None
) -> List[AttackTree]:
"""
Generate attack trees for identified attack goals.
Process:
1. Identify potential attack goals based on tool capabilities
2. Build tree structure using AND/OR logic gates
3. Calculate probability and cost for each node
4. Identify critical attack paths
5. Generate comprehensive attack tree objects
"""- Probability Calculation: Bottom-up propagation using Boolean logic
- Cost Estimation: Resource requirements for each attack step
- Critical Path Analysis: Most likely and cost-effective attack routes
- Time to Compromise: Estimated attack timeline
The system models six primary threat actor types:
- Insider Threat: Employees, contractors with legitimate access
- External Attacker: Outside attackers seeking unauthorized access
- Supply Chain: Compromised dependencies or third-party tools
- Nation State: Advanced persistent threat groups
- Cybercriminal: Profit-motivated attackers
- Hacktivist: Ideologically motivated groups
@dataclass
class ThreatActorProfile:
"""Comprehensive threat actor profile."""
name: str
type: ThreatActorType
skill_level: str # novice, intermediate, advanced, expert
motivation: str
resources: str # limited, moderate, substantial, unlimited
preferred_targets: List[str]
typical_attack_vectors: List[str]
sophistication_level: int # 1-10 scale
persistence_level: str # opportunistic, determined, persistent
stealth_capability: str # low, medium, high, advancedEach threat actor type generates tailored attack scenarios:
scenario_templates = {
ThreatActorType.INSIDER_THREAT: {
"data_theft": {
"description": "Insider abuses legitimate access to exfiltrate sensitive data",
"techniques": ["T1005", "T1041", "T1048"],
"detection_difficulty": "high"
},
"sabotage": {
"description": "Disgruntled employee damages systems or data",
"techniques": ["T1485", "T1490", "T1529"],
"detection_difficulty": "medium"
}
}
# ... additional actor types
}The AttackVectorGenerator creates attack vectors dynamically based on tool capabilities:
def _get_function_risk_indicators(self, function_name: str) -> List[str]:
"""
Identify risk indicators from function names using pattern matching.
Risk Categories:
- File System Access: read_file, write_file, delete_file
- Network Operations: http_request, download, upload
- System Commands: execute, run, shell
- Database Operations: query, insert, update
- Authentication: login, authenticate, authorize
"""attack_templates = {
"file_access": {
"vectors": [
{
"name": "Unauthorized File Access",
"severity": "high",
"description": "Exploit file access functions to read sensitive data",
"attack_steps": [
"Identify file access functions",
"Craft malicious file paths",
"Execute unauthorized file operations",
"Exfiltrate sensitive information"
]
}
]
}
}The system maps MCP tool capabilities to MITRE ATT&CK techniques:
technique_mappings = {
'command_execution': {
'technique_id': 'T1059',
'technique_name': 'Command and Scripting Interpreter',
'description': 'Execute arbitrary commands through tool functions',
'severity': 'critical'
},
'file_system_access': {
'technique_id': 'T1083',
'technique_name': 'File and Directory Discovery',
'description': 'Access and manipulate file system through tool capabilities',
'severity': 'high'
},
'network_access': {
'technique_id': 'T1071',
'technique_name': 'Application Layer Protocol',
'description': 'Abuse network capabilities for command and control',
'severity': 'high'
}
}Techniques are organized by MITRE ATT&CK tactics:
- Initial Access: T1566 (Phishing), T1190 (Exploit Public-Facing Application)
- Execution: T1059 (Command and Scripting Interpreter)
- Persistence: T1505 (Server Software Component)
- Privilege Escalation: T1078 (Valid Accounts)
- Defense Evasion: T1027 (Obfuscated Files or Information)
- Credential Access: T1110 (Brute Force)
- Discovery: T1083 (File and Directory Discovery)
- Collection: T1005 (Data from Local System)
- Exfiltration: T1041 (Exfiltration Over C2 Channel)
The AttackChainAnalyzer identifies sophisticated attack scenarios using multiple MCP tools:
sequenceDiagram
participant AAC as AttackChainAnalyzer
participant TCG as ToolCapabilityGraph
participant APF as AttackPathFinder
participant CFS as ChainFeasibilityScorer
AAC->>TCG: Build capability relationships
TCG-->>AAC: Tool capability graph
AAC->>APF: Find potential attack paths
APF-->>AAC: Attack path candidates
AAC->>CFS: Assess chain feasibility
CFS-->>AAC: Feasibility scores
AAC->>AAC: Rank and filter chains
AAC-->>AAC: High-priority attack chains
- Sequential Chains: Tool A → Tool B → Tool C
- Parallel Chains: Multiple tools used simultaneously
- Branching Chains: One tool enables multiple attack paths
- Convergent Chains: Multiple tools contribute to single goal
@dataclass
class ChainFeasibilityScore:
"""Feasibility assessment for attack chains."""
technical_feasibility: float # 0.0-1.0
resource_requirements: float # 0.0-1.0 (inverted - lower is better)
detection_likelihood: float # 0.0-1.0 (inverted - lower is better)
overall_score: float # Weighted combination
confidence_level: str # low, medium, high
limiting_factors: List[str] # Factors that reduce feasibilityThe ScenarioBuilder creates detailed, realistic attack scenarios:
- Threat Actor Profile: Who is conducting the attack
- Attack Timeline: Sequence of events with timestamps
- Attack Phases: Reconnaissance, initial access, lateral movement, etc.
- Technical Details: Specific commands, tools, and techniques used
- Business Impact: Potential damage and consequences
- Detection Opportunities: Points where the attack might be detected
- Mitigation Strategies: How to prevent or respond to the attack
scenario = {
'id': 'external_attacker_data_exfiltration',
'title': 'External Attacker: Corporate Data Theft',
'threat_actor': {
'name': 'Advanced Cybercriminal Group',
'type': 'external_attacker',
'skill_level': 'advanced',
'motivation': 'financial_gain'
},
'attack_phases': [
{
'phase': 'reconnaissance',
'duration': '2-3 days',
'activities': ['Network scanning', 'Service enumeration', 'Vulnerability assessment']
},
{
'phase': 'initial_access',
'duration': '4-6 hours',
'activities': ['Exploit MCP server vulnerability', 'Establish foothold']
}
# ... additional phases
]
}The LikelihoodAssessor implements sophisticated probability models:
- Attack Complexity: Technical difficulty of exploitation
- Environmental Factors: Network topology, security controls
- Threat Actor Capabilities: Skill level and resources
- Target Attractiveness: Value and accessibility of assets
- Historical Patterns: Similar attacks in the past
@dataclass
class ThreatLikelihoodMatrix:
"""Comprehensive threat likelihood assessment."""
threat_id: str
base_probability: float # Inherent threat likelihood
environmental_modifiers: Dict[str, float] # Environment-specific adjustments
actor_capability_score: float # Threat actor capability assessment
target_attractiveness: float # Asset value and accessibility
historical_frequency: float # Historical attack frequency
final_likelihood: float # Final calculated likelihood
confidence_interval: Tuple[float, float] # Confidence range
assessment_summary: str # Human-readable summaryThe threat modeling engine implements intelligent caching:
class ThreatModelCache:
"""Cache for threat modeling results."""
def __init__(self):
self.stride_cache = {} # STRIDE analysis results
self.tree_cache = {} # Attack tree structures
self.scenario_cache = {} # Generated scenarios
self.chain_cache = {} # Attack chain analysis- Concurrent STRIDE Analysis: Each category analyzed in parallel
- Parallel Tree Generation: Multiple attack trees built simultaneously
- Distributed Scenario Building: Scenario generation across multiple threads
- Asynchronous Chain Analysis: Non-blocking attack chain discovery
- Threat Model Validation: Ensure completeness and consistency
- MITRE ATT&CK Mapping Verification: Validate technique mappings
- Scenario Realism Checks: Verify attack scenario feasibility
- Cross-Reference Validation: Check consistency across components
- Unit Tests: Individual component functionality
- Integration Tests: Cross-component interaction
- Scenario Validation: Real-world attack scenario testing
- Performance Benchmarks: Scalability and efficiency testing
threat_model_profiles = {
"comprehensive": {
"stride_analysis": True,
"attack_trees": True,
"threat_actors": "all",
"max_chain_length": 5,
"scenario_count": 10
},
"focused": {
"stride_analysis": True,
"attack_trees": False,
"threat_actors": ["external_attacker", "insider_threat"],
"max_chain_length": 3,
"scenario_count": 5
}
}- Analysis Depth: Surface-level vs. deep analysis
- Threat Actor Focus: Specific actor types to emphasize
- Risk Threshold: Minimum risk level for inclusion
- Time Constraints: Maximum analysis duration
- Output Format: Detailed vs. summary reporting
-
Tool Capabilities: From
MCPCapabilityAnalyzer - Environment Context: From environment analysis components
- Detection Results: From MCP introspection and detection pipeline
- Report Generator: Consumes threat models for report creation
- Risk Assessor: Uses threat analysis for risk scoring
- Mitigation Planner: Leverages threat models for countermeasure planning
- Security Dashboard: Displays threat modeling results
- Machine Learning Integration: ML-based threat prediction
- Dynamic Threat Intelligence: Real-time threat feed integration
- Automated Scenario Validation: AI-powered scenario verification
- Advanced Visualization: Interactive threat model displays
- Collaborative Threat Modeling: Multi-user threat model development
- Quantum Threat Modeling: Post-quantum cryptography threats
- AI/ML Attack Modeling: AI-specific attack vectors
- Cloud-Native Threats: Container and serverless attack models
- Supply Chain Risk Modeling: Third-party dependency threats
The Threat Modeling Engine provides comprehensive, automated threat analysis capabilities that transform raw MCP tool discoveries into actionable security intelligence. Through STRIDE analysis, attack tree generation, threat actor profiling, and MITRE ATT&CK integration, it delivers the detailed threat models security teams need to understand, prioritize, and defend against potential attacks on their MCP infrastructure.