Update tests workflow coverage handling #68
Conversation
|
Note Gemini is unable to generate a summary for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported. |
WalkthroughThe GitHub Actions workflow for running Go tests was updated to run tests across two specific Go versions, generate separate coverage files for each test group and Go version, merge these files into single coverage reports per Go version, and upload the merged reports as artifacts. Additionally, new edge case tests for Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~15 minutes Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/tests.yml(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.7)
.github/workflows/tests.yml
54-54: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (2)
50-52:go tool cover -mergeis only available starting with Go 1.22Using
cover -mergeis fine, but it implicitly requires Go ≥ 1.22. Once the version pin above is fixed, ensure the selected toolchain still provides this sub-command.
12-13: Go 1.24.5 is a valid release—no change needed.The curl+jq check confirms
go1.24.5appears in the official Go download list, so pinning to that version won’t break the workflow. You can safely ignore the suggestion to downgrade to 1.22.x.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
gocanto
force-pushed
the
codex/update-go-version-and-improve-coverage-handling
branch
from
b0460e8 to
ef13b0b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/tests.yml(1 hunks)database/model_internal_test.go(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/tests.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
database/model_internal_test.go (1)
database/model.go (1)
isValidTable(22-24)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
database/model_internal_test.go (1)
3-6: LGTM!The addition of the "strings" import is necessary and correctly placed for the new test function.
| func TestIsValidTableEdgeCases(t *testing.T) { | ||
| invalid := []string{ | ||
| "", | ||
| "user!@#", | ||
| "user-name", | ||
| "Users", | ||
| "USERS", | ||
| "table123", | ||
| strings.Repeat("x", 256), | ||
| " ", | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for _, name := range invalid { | ||
| if isValidTable(name) { | ||
| t.Fatalf("%q should be invalid", name) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Test logic misalignment with actual implementation.
The test assumes isValidTable performs string validation (checking for special characters, case sensitivity, length limits, etc.), but based on the implementation in database/model.go, the function only checks if the input exists in the schemaTables slice using slices.Contains.
This test will pass if none of these edge case strings are present in schemaTables, but it's not actually testing string validation logic - it's testing slice membership. The test name and structure suggest it's meant to validate input format rules, which don't exist in the current implementation.
Consider either:
- Updating the test to reflect the actual behavior (slice membership testing)
- Implementing proper string validation in
isValidTableif that's the intended behavior
Let me verify what's actually in the schemaTables slice to understand the expected behavior:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find the schemaTables definition to understand what valid table names are expected
# Expected: Find the slice definition and its contents
ast-grep --pattern 'schemaTables = $_'Length of output: 40
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -e
# Locate isValidTable implementation with context
rg -n "func isValidTable" -C5
# Locate schemaTables definition or assignment with context
rg -n "schemaTables" -C5Length of output: 1451
Align test behavior with isValidTable or extend isValidTable functionality
The test TestIsValidTableEdgeCases in database/model_internal_test.go (lines 17–34) currently only verifies that arbitrary strings aren’t present in schemaTables, but does not exercise any format or character‐set rules. Meanwhile, isValidTable in database/model.go (lines 22–24) simply returns slices.Contains(schemaTables, seed) without any additional validation. To resolve this misalignment, choose one of the following:
- Update the test to reflect membership‐only behavior:
- Rename it (e.g.
TestIsValidTableNonexistentTables). - Add positive cases using
GetSchemaTables()to assert that known valid names return true.
- Rename it (e.g.
- Enhance
isValidTableto enforce format rules:- Add regex or character checks for allowed characters (lowercase letters, underscores, numeric).
- Enforce length limits (e.g. 1–255 characters) and reject leading/trailing whitespace.
- Then update tests to cover both membership and format validations.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In database/model_internal_test.go lines 17 to 34, the test currently checks
only if table names exist in schemaTables without validating format rules, while
isValidTable in database/model.go lines 22 to 24 only checks membership. To fix
this, either rename and adjust the test to verify only membership by adding
positive cases from GetSchemaTables, or enhance isValidTable to include format
validation such as regex for allowed characters, length limits, and whitespace
checks, then update the test to cover these new validations accordingly.
Summary
Testing
go test ./...https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_688c59e8dfd4833396d34e73f6c4ea88
Summary by CodeRabbit