put interrupt monitor behind a feature flag#243
Merged
Nieuwejaar merged 1 commit intomainfrom Mar 31, 2026
Merged
Conversation
rcgoodfellow
approved these changes
Mar 31, 2026
Contributor
|
The primary thing we lose here is the ability to detect TCAM parity errors. We should work toward being able to detect at least that, and if possible to enable/detect all RAS interrupts. But given the the issues we've seen in the lab that seem to be interrupt related, this seems prudent. |
Collaborator
Author
Agreed. I'm going to keep digging for a root cause. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There is still no root cause for #241, but it certainly seems likely that interrupts are involved. The kernel code handling tofino/tfpkt interrupts hasn't changed in years, but
dpdrecently added code that monitors/manipulates interrupts in userspace.Until the specific problem is identified, I would like to disable the userspace interrupt code with the hope that it will address the issue, allowing us to ship R19. Unfortunately, since the appearance of the performance issue seems to be non-deterministic, I can't prove that this change will be effective even in the short term. The best I can say is that I haven't seen a recurrence on madrid with these changes in place.