Skip to content

feat(map_type): support custom map types.#1011

Merged
ahl merged 2 commits intooxidecomputer:mainfrom
JosiahBull:jo/support-custom-map-types
Dec 24, 2024
Merged

feat(map_type): support custom map types.#1011
ahl merged 2 commits intooxidecomputer:mainfrom
JosiahBull:jo/support-custom-map-types

Conversation

@JosiahBull
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #985

@ahl Let me know what more you'd like to see here, kept the initial impl pretty bare bones as last time.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ahl ahl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Thanks for this. Let's get CI sorted out

@JosiahBull JosiahBull force-pushed the jo/support-custom-map-types branch from fdc7f02 to ac0212a Compare December 23, 2024 19:27
@JosiahBull JosiahBull force-pushed the jo/support-custom-map-types branch from ac0212a to 187d12a Compare December 23, 2024 19:35
@JosiahBull
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ahl Resolved CI issues. 😄

@ahl ahl merged commit cb9bf78 into oxidecomputer:main Dec 24, 2024
@ahl
Copy link
Collaborator

ahl commented Dec 24, 2024

Thanks for the contribution!

github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit to flox/flox that referenced this pull request May 30, 2025
Our version of progenitor was stuck on `0.6.0` since we specified `0.6`
in our Cargo.toml, and cargo/dependabot won't bump potentially breaking
changes, i.e. major version bumps or minor version bumps iff major == 0.

While this alos required bumping reqwest, at least statically, no
further breakages were discovered by this.

Notable changes:

- oxidecomputer/progenitor#1120
- oxidecomputer/progenitor#1017
- oxidecomputer/progenitor#1011
- oxidecomputer/progenitor#949
- oxidecomputer/typify#584
abus-sh pushed a commit to abus-sh/progenitor that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support Generating IndexMap Instead of HashMap

2 participants