chore: update uuid format names

[JP-Ellis]

📝 Summary

Define types for the various supported UUID formats.

🚨 Breaking Changes

🔥 Motivation

🔨 Test Plan

🔗 Related issues/PRs

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR defines a reusable type for UUID format names to improve code maintainability and consistency across modules. The change replaces inline Literal type annotations with a centralized _UUID_FORMAT_NAMES type definition.

• Extracts UUID format names into a reusable _UUID_FORMAT_NAMES type
• Updates type annotations to use the new centralized type
• Adds explicit type annotations to _UUID_FORMATS dictionaries

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File	Description
src/pact/match/init.py	Defines _UUID_FORMAT_NAMES type and updates function parameter annotation
src/pact/generate/init.py	Defines _UUID_FORMAT_NAMES type and updates function parameter annotation

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[Copilot]

The _UUID_FORMAT_NAMES type is duplicated across both files. Consider defining it in a shared module to maintain a single source of truth and prevent inconsistencies.

Suggested change

	_UUID_FORMAT_NAMES = Literal["simple", "lowercase", "uppercase", "urn"]
	from pact.types import _UUID_FORMAT_NAMES

[Copilot]

The _UUID_FORMAT_NAMES type is duplicated across both files. Consider defining it in a shared module to maintain a single source of truth and prevent inconsistencies.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 52%. Comparing base (65cf3bc) to head (372a620).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@         Coverage Diff          @@
##           main   #1251   +/-   ##
====================================
  Coverage    52%     52%           
====================================
  Files        32      32           
  Lines      3725    3727    +2     
====================================
+ Hits       1963    1965    +2     
  Misses     1762    1762           

Flag	Coverage Δ
tests	52% <100%> (+<1%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.