Skip to content

docs: create plan/pending-prs.md with prioritized PR analysis#183

Open
ericelliott wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
cursor/pending-prs-report-e269
Open

docs: create plan/pending-prs.md with prioritized PR analysis#183
ericelliott wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
cursor/pending-prs-report-e269

Conversation

@ericelliott
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Closes #182.

Creates plan/pending-prs.md — a structured analysis of all 29 open PRs to help prioritize and accelerate merging the most load-bearing work.

What's in the report

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

Analyzes all 29 open PRs, ranks them into 4 tiers by load-bearing
dependency weight, identifies conflict hotspots, and provides a
recommended merge order to unblock the backlog as quickly as possible.

Closes #182

Co-authored-by: Eric Elliott <support@paralleldrive.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 8, 2026 00:19
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Creates a new planning document (plan/pending-prs.md) to catalog and prioritize the repository’s 29 currently-open pull requests, with tiering, conflict-hotspot identification, and a recommended merge sequence to reduce rebase/conflict churn.

Changes:

  • Added a tiered prioritization of open PRs (Tier 1–4) with rationale, risks, and dependencies.
  • Added a recommended merge order list and conflict-hotspot map for high-churn files.
  • Added a consolidated status table summarizing all open PRs with size, tier, and priority.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread plan/pending-prs.md
2. **#168** — `/aidd-pr` skill + eval infrastructure (unblocks CI/CD review automation and eval harness)
3. **#80** — Skills Protocol migration from commands/rules (resolves naming/path inconsistencies that make many other PRs conflict)

Nine additional PRs are high-value and near-ready. The remaining PRs fall into docs-only, planning, or stale/blocked categories.
Copy link

Copilot AI Apr 8, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Executive Summary says “Nine additional PRs are high-value and near-ready”, but Tier 2 lists 10 PRs (#129, #144, #26, #27, #154, #178, #165, #170, #171, #179). Update the count (or adjust Tier 2 membership) so the summary matches the detailed list.

Suggested change
Nine additional PRs are high-value and near-ready. The remaining PRs fall into docs-only, planning, or stale/blocked categories.
Ten additional PRs are high-value and near-ready. The remaining PRs fall into docs-only, planning, or stale/blocked categories.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment thread plan/pending-prs.md
- **Assessment:** Adds `.github/workflows/aidd-review-claude.yml`. Requires `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` secret. Low conflict risk; high leverage once merged (reviews all subsequent PRs automatically).
- **Prerequisite:** Confirm secret is configured in repo settings.

### #178 — Fix `SCAFFOLD_MANIFEST.yml` (underscore) in tarball downloads
Copy link

Copilot AI Apr 8, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The scaffold manifest filename appears to be canonicalized elsewhere in the repo as SCAFFOLD-MANIFEST.yml (hyphen). This line references SCAFFOLD_MANIFEST.yml (underscore), which may mislead readers about the actual filename and the nature of PR #178; consider correcting to SCAFFOLD-MANIFEST.yml or clarifying that the PR fixes underscore→hyphen handling.

Suggested change
### #178 — Fix `SCAFFOLD_MANIFEST.yml` (underscore) in tarball downloads
### #178 — Fix `SCAFFOLD_MANIFEST.yml` `SCAFFOLD-MANIFEST.yml` handling in tarball downloads

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Pull Request Management

3 participants