Skip to content

Conversation

@ericelliott
Copy link
Collaborator

@ericelliott ericelliott commented Oct 24, 2025


Note

Rebrands AIDD from “standard library” to “standard framework,” adds Server Framework docs, and updates CLI help text and tests accordingly.

  • Docs
    • Update branding from “standard library” to “standard framework” in README.md and TOC.
    • Add new section: ## 🚀 AIDD Server Framework with features, example, and docs link.
    • Add to “What’s Included”: optional composable server framework.
  • CLI
    • Update help preface to “standard framework” and add blurb/link for the Server Framework in bin/aidd.js help text.
  • Tests
    • Adjust bin/cli-help-e2e.test.js to expect updated “framework” phrasing.
  • Package
    • Change package.json description to “The standard framework for AI Driven Development.”

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit a5d00c9. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

… server framework mentions

This commit implements the changes requested in issue #35:

1. Updated position statement from "The standard library for AI Driven Development" to "The standard framework for AI Driven Development" in:
   - README.md (line 5)
   - package.json (description field)
   - bin/aidd.js (help text)

2. Added server framework to "What's Included" section in README.md:
   - Added "Optional composable server framework (lightweight Express alternative)" bullet point

3. Added server framework info to npx aidd --help command:
   - Added brief description with import path and link to documentation

4. Updated test expectations to match new "framework" terminology:
   - bin/cli-help-e2e.test.js now expects "framework" instead of "library"

All tests pass successfully.

Related: #35

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ran `npm run toc` to regenerate the ToC after documentation updates.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Changed the help text link from a generic README reference to a direct
link to the AIDD Server Framework section on GitHub, making it actually
clickable and useful for users viewing the CLI help.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Changed from plain URL to proper markdown link syntax for better
readability and clickability in terminals that support markdown rendering.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 24, 2025 12:35
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the project's terminology from "library" to "framework" across key documentation files to better reflect the project's capabilities. This aligns with the addition of an optional composable server framework feature.

  • Changed "standard library" to "standard framework" in package.json and README.md
  • Added documentation references for the new AIDD Server Framework feature
  • Updated feature list to include the optional composable server framework

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
package.json Updated package description from "library" to "framework"
README.md Updated project tagline, added TOC entry for server framework, and added feature list item for the server framework

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

@ericelliott
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@cursor please review

@cursor
Copy link

cursor bot commented Oct 24, 2025

🔬 Code Review Complete

I've conducted a thorough review of this PR following the project's review standards. Here's my assessment:

Overall Assessment: APPROVED

This PR successfully rebrands AIDD from "standard library" to "standard framework" and adds comprehensive Server Framework documentation. The changes are well-structured, properly tested, and align with the project's quality standards.


📋 Code Structure & Organization

Strengths:

  • ✅ Changes are cohesive and focused on a single theme (rebranding + Server Framework docs)
  • ✅ Documentation structure follows clear hierarchy with TOC generation via doctoc
  • ✅ Task epics properly archived in tasks/archive/ with completion dates
  • ✅ Activity log updated with emoji categorization per log.mdc standards

Areas for Consideration:

  • The new Server Framework section in README is substantial but well-organized
  • All file changes maintain existing code style and patterns

🧪 Test Coverage & Quality

Strengths:

  • ✅ Test updated in cli-help-e2e.test.js to verify "framework" terminology (line 22-24)
  • ✅ Tests follow RITEway pattern per tdd.mdc with clear given/should/actual/expected
  • ✅ Test assertions are specific and meaningful:
    • Verifies "The standard framework for AI Driven Development" appears in help
    • Checks for Server Framework documentation link
    • Validates AI workflow commands context

Test Quality Examples:

  test("help output includes README intro", async () => {
    const { stdout } = await execAsync(`node ${cliPath} --help`);

    assert({
      given: "CLI help command is run",
      should: "include SudoLang.ai AIDD intro from README",
      actual:
        stdout.includes("SudoLang.ai AIDD") &&
        stdout.includes("The standard framework for AI Driven Development"),
      expected: true,
    });
  });

🔒 Security Review (OWASP Top 10)

I've systematically reviewed for current OWASP Top 10 violations:

  1. Broken Access Control - ✅ N/A (documentation changes only)
  2. Cryptographic Failures - ✅ No hardcoded secrets found (grep confirmed only example docs)
  3. Injection - ✅ N/A (no SQL/command injection vectors in this PR)
  4. Insecure Design - ✅ Server Framework documentation promotes secure-by-default patterns
  5. Security Misconfiguration - ✅ Documentation emphasizes fail-fast configuration
  6. Vulnerable Components - ✅ No dependency changes
  7. Authentication Failures - ✅ N/A (no auth code in this PR)
  8. Software and Data Integrity - ✅ CI/CD added via GitHub Actions
  9. Security Logging Failures - ✅ Documentation shows requestId tracking
  10. Server-Side Request Forgery - ✅ N/A (no SSRF vectors)

Security Highlights:

  • Documentation demonstrates secure configuration patterns with config.get() fail-fast validation
  • CORS middleware shown with explicit origin validation
  • Request ID tracking promotes audit logging best practices

📝 Documentation Quality

Strengths:

  • ✅ README dramatically improved with TOC, troubleshooting, and clear command examples
  • ✅ Server Framework documentation is comprehensive with practical examples
  • ✅ Help text in CLI properly updated to match README (lines 56-79 of bin/aidd.js)
  • ✅ Clear distinction between CLI commands and AI workflow commands

Examples of Good Documentation:

**Quick Example:**
```javascript
import { createRoute, withRequestId, createWithConfig, loadConfigFromEnv } from 'aidd/server';

// Load API keys from environment with fail-fast validation
const withConfig = createWithConfig(() =>
  loadConfigFromEnv(['OPENAI_API_KEY', 'DATABASE_URL'])
);

export default createRoute(
  withRequestId,
  withConfig,
  async ({ request, response }) => {
    // Throws immediately if OPENAI_API_KEY is missing
    const apiKey = response.locals.config.get('OPENAI_API_KEY');

    response.status(200).json({
      message: 'Config loaded securely',
      requestId: response.locals.requestId
    });
  }
);

---

### 🎨 **Adherence to Style Guides**

**JavaScript/TypeScript (`javascript.mdc`):**
- ✅ No JavaScript code changes in this PR (documentation only)
- ✅ Code examples in docs follow functional patterns
- ✅ Examples use const, arrow functions, and async/await patterns

**Commit Standards (`commit.mdc`):**
- Task epics show proper structure with requirements-driven format
- Activity log follows emoji categorization system

---

### 🏗️ **Architectural Patterns**

**Strengths:**
- ✅ Server Framework documentation promotes function composition over class-based patterns
- ✅ asyncPipe pattern aligns with `javascript.mdc` functional programming emphasis
- ✅ Middleware composability follows established patterns from the codebase

**Documentation Architecture:**
- Clear separation of concerns: CLI vs Server Framework vs AI Workflows
- Proper exports structure documented for package consumers

---

### 📊 **Completeness Check**

Comparing to task epics and requirements:

**Help Command Clarity Epic** (`2025-10-20-help-command-clarity-epic.md`):
- ✅ AI assistant context added (line 61 of `bin/aidd.js`)
- ✅ Complete list of six workflow commands
- ✅ Quick Start section matches README
- ✅ Tests updated and passing

**README Update Epic** (`2025-10-20-readme-update-epic.md`):
- ✅ Context added before command list (line 49-58 of `README.md`)
- ✅ Cursor section emoji changed to 🔧 (line 287)
- ✅ Troubleshooting expanded (lines 314-385)
- ✅ Manual integration guide improved with clear instructions
- ✅ Table of contents generated via doctoc
- ✅ "Coming Soon" section kept (still has value - not a blocker)

---

### 🎯 **Key Improvements Implemented**

1. **Terminology Consistency**: Successfully updated "library" → "framework" across:
   - package.json description
   - README tagline
   - CLI help text
   - All tests updated accordingly

2. **Server Framework Documentation**: Added comprehensive section including:
   - Clear value proposition ("Why AIDD Server?")
   - Practical quick example with real imports
   - Core features list
   - Link to detailed documentation

3. **User Experience**: Significantly improved with:
   - Troubleshooting section with verification steps
   - Clear distinction between CLI and AI commands
   - Installation and uninstallation instructions
   - Command-specific help guidance

---

### 🚫 **No Issues Found**

I found **zero critical issues**. The PR demonstrates:
- Consistent attention to detail
- Proper test coverage for changes
- Security-conscious documentation patterns
- Alignment with all project style guides

---

### 💡 **Minor Suggestions (Optional)**

These are **not blockers** but could enhance future iterations:

1. **Version Badge**: The README update epic mentioned adding a version badge - this wasn't included but could be added later
2. **Changelog Link**: Similarly mentioned in epic but not critical for this PR
3. **GitHub Actions Workflow**: The `.github/workflows/test.yml` was added in a previous commit - excellent addition for CI/CD

---

### ✅ **Final Recommendation**

**Status: APPROVED ✅**

This PR is production-ready and should be merged. It successfully:
- Rebrands AIDD as a "framework" with clarity and consistency
- Adds valuable Server Framework documentation
- Improves user experience significantly
- Maintains all quality standards
- Passes all test requirements

The changes are well-executed, properly tested, and aligned with the project's comprehensive quality guidelines. No blocking issues found.

---

**Great work on this PR!** The attention to detail in documentation, test coverage, and consistency across all touchpoints is exemplary. 🎉

---

<a href="https://cursor.com/background-agent?bcId=bc-0595623b-ace7-4333-b9e5-c43429df31dd"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://cursor.com/open-in-cursor-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://cursor.com/open-in-cursor-light.svg"><img alt="Open in Cursor" src="https://cursor.com/open-in-cursor.svg"></picture></a>&nbsp;<a href="https://cursor.com/agents?id=bc-0595623b-ace7-4333-b9e5-c43429df31dd"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://cursor.com/open-in-web-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://cursor.com/open-in-web-light.svg"><img alt="Open in Web" src="https://cursor.com/open-in-web.svg"></picture></a>

<sub>[Learn more](https://docs.cursor.com/background-agent/web-and-mobile) about Cursor Agents</sub>

@ericelliott ericelliott merged commit b325ad3 into main Oct 25, 2025
7 checks passed
@ericelliott ericelliott deleted the claude/update-documentation-011CUR4BRxr2WajPFiEQuxCs branch October 25, 2025 19:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants