Skip to content

refactor: Bump jasmine from 6.1.0 to 6.2.0#876

Merged
mtrezza merged 1 commit intoparse-community:masterfrom
mtrezza:refactor/jasmine-6.2.0
Apr 16, 2026
Merged

refactor: Bump jasmine from 6.1.0 to 6.2.0#876
mtrezza merged 1 commit intoparse-community:masterfrom
mtrezza:refactor/jasmine-6.2.0

Conversation

@mtrezza
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mtrezza mtrezza commented Apr 16, 2026

Bumps jasmine from 6.1.0 to 6.2.0.

This is a replacement PR for #867 to trigger CI.

Closes #867

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the jasmine testing framework dependency to version 6.2.0

@parse-github-assistant
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Thanks for opening this pull request! We appreciate your effort in improving the project. Please let us know once your pull request is ready for review.

Tip

  • Keep pull requests small. Large PRs will be rejected. Break complex features into smaller, incremental PRs.
  • Use Test Driven Development. Write failing tests before implementing functionality. Ensure tests pass.
  • Group code into logical blocks. Add a short comment before each block to explain its purpose.
  • We offer conceptual guidance. Coding is up to you. PRs must be merge-ready for human review.
  • Our review focuses on concept, not quality. PRs with code issues will be rejected. Use an AI agent.
  • Human review time is precious. Avoid review ping-pong. Inspect and test your AI-generated code.

Note

Please respond to review comments from AI agents just like you would to comments from a human reviewer. Let the reviewer resolve their own comments, unless they have reviewed and accepted your commit, or agreed with your explanation for why the feedback was incorrect.

Caution

Pull requests must be written using an AI agent with human supervision. Pull requests written entirely by a human will likely be rejected, because of lower code quality, higher review effort and the higher risk of introducing bugs. Please note that AI review comments on this pull request alone do not satisfy this requirement. Our CI and AI review are safeguards, not development tools. If many issues are flagged, rethink your development approach. Invest more effort in planning and design rather than using review cycles to fix low-quality code.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 16, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The PR updates the jasmine testing framework dependency from version 6.1.0 to 6.2.0. Changes include version bumps in package.json and corresponding updates to resolved URLs and integrity hashes in package-lock.json.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Dependency Version Updates
package.json, package-lock.json
Updated jasmine and jasmine-core versions from 6.1.0 to 6.2.0, including resolved tarball URLs and integrity hash checksums.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 6 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Engage In Review Feedback ⚠️ Warning PR author did not engage with review feedback about jasmine v6.2.0 validity; no discussion, commits, or evidence provided. Revert jasmine to v6.1.0 or provide evidence that v6.2.0 exists and discuss validity with the reviewer.
✅ Passed checks (6 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title begins with 'refactor:' which is one of the required prefixes and clearly describes the main change: upgrading jasmine from 6.1.0 to 6.2.0.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed The pull request successfully updates jasmine from 6.1.0 to 6.2.0 in both package.json and package-lock.json, fully satisfying the objective stated in linked issue #867.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed All changes are limited to updating jasmine dependency versions in package.json and package-lock.json, with no unrelated or out-of-scope modifications.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Security Check ✅ Passed Pull request updates jasmine dev dependency with proper SHA512 integrity hashes and no security vulnerabilities.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 Checkov (3.2.519)
package.json

2026-04-16 20:53:04,128 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Template file not found: package.json
2026-04-16 20:53:04,131 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Template file not found: package.json
2026-04-16 20:53:04,135 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Template file not found: package.json
2026-04-16 20:53:04,236 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Failed to invoke function /usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/runners/object_runner. with package.json
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/parallelizer/parallel_runner.py", line 88, in func_wrapper
result = original_func(item)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/runners/object_runner.py", line 74, in
results = parallel_runner.run_function(lambda f: (f, self._parse_file(f)), files_to_load)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/ope

... [truncated 2547 characters] ...

[MainThread ] [WARNI] Secret scanning: could not process file package.json
2026-04-16 20:53:04,388 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Exception traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/main.py", line 647, in run
self.scan_reports = runner_registry.run(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/runners/runner_registry.py", line 177, in run
for result in parallel_runner_results:
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/parallelizer/parallel_runner.py", line 118, in _run_function_multiprocess_fork
raise v.internal_exception.with_traceback(v.internal_exception.traceback)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'package.json'


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously requested changes Apr 16, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@package.json`:
- Line 44: The package.json currently lists the non-existent dependency version
"jasmine": "6.2.0"; change the "jasmine" dependency value back to a valid
released version (e.g. "6.1.0") or the correct intended version, save
package.json, then run npm install (or npm ci and update the lockfile) to ensure
the dependency graph is consistent.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: aaf6dc51-dac8-4d67-bc3c-df9dcbe4d3d2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0ceae73 and b7a2d9f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • package-lock.json
  • package.json

Comment thread package.json
"eslint": "10.2.0",
"globals": "17.5.0",
"jasmine": "6.1.0",
"jasmine": "6.2.0",
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

🌐 Web query:

For jasmine npm package, what changed between v6.1.0 and v6.2.0 (especially breaking changes, Node.js engine requirements, and CLI behavior)?

💡 Result:

No changes between jasmine npm package v6.1.0 and v6.2.0 because v6.2.0 does not exist as of 2026-04-16. The latest version is v6.1.0, released on 2026-02-22. v6.1.0 updates the jasmine-core dependency to 6.1.0. No breaking changes specific to jasmine-npm v6.1.0. Node.js engine requirements remain Node 20, 22, and 24 (tested versions). No mentions of CLI behavior changes. For context on v6.1.0 (from v6.0.0): - Breaking changes (in v6.0.0): Node 18 no longer supported; only first config file loaded if multiple present; ConsoleReporter moved to @jasminejs/reporters. - New features (in v6.0.0): Console reporter respects NO_COLOR env var; compatibility with glob 10-13. - CLI behavior: npx jasmine init/examples/run unchanged per docs.

Citations:


Do not upgrade jasmine to v6.2.0—this version does not exist. The latest version is v6.1.0 (released 2026-02-22). Upgrading to a non-existent version will cause npm install to fail. Either revert to v6.1.0 or verify the intended target version.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@package.json` at line 44, The package.json currently lists the non-existent
dependency version "jasmine": "6.2.0"; change the "jasmine" dependency value
back to a valid released version (e.g. "6.1.0") or the correct intended version,
save package.json, then run npm install (or npm ci and update the lockfile) to
ensure the dependency graph is consistent.

@mtrezza mtrezza dismissed coderabbitai[bot]’s stale review April 16, 2026 20:55

False positive: jasmine 6.2.0 is a valid published version on npm. The install succeeded and all CI checks pass.

@mtrezza mtrezza merged commit 9867131 into parse-community:master Apr 16, 2026
4 checks passed
@mtrezza mtrezza deleted the refactor/jasmine-6.2.0 branch April 16, 2026 20:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant