Skip to content

fix(request): show some request info on already paid view#412

Merged
Hugo0 merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom
feat/request-success-view
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

fix(request): show some request info on already paid view#412
Hugo0 merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom
feat/request-success-view

Conversation

@jjramirezn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jjramirezn jjramirezn commented Oct 3, 2024

We were moving the state before setting the link data, this commit sets the link data before moving the state in case of an already paid link.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved navigation within the payment request flow by updating links and prompts.
    • Enhanced display logic for token symbols to ensure accurate information is shown.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated the timing of data retrieval for request link details to improve user experience.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 3, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to two components within the payment request functionality. In Pay.tsx, the checkRequestLink function is modified to update the requestLinkData state immediately after fetching request link details. In AlreadyPaid.view.tsx, the useRouter import is removed, and the component's navigation logic is adjusted, including a change in the link target and text prompt. These modifications affect the timing of state updates and the user interface without altering the overall control flow or public entity declarations.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/components/Request/Pay/Pay.tsx Modified checkRequestLink to set requestLinkData immediately after fetching request link details.
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx Removed useRouter import, adjusted token symbol fallback logic, updated Link target from '/send' to '/request/create', and changed link text from "Make a payment yourself!" to "Request a payment yourself!".

Possibly related PRs

  • Estimating points and saving them #381: Modifications to the Pay.tsx file introducing a new function for estimating points based on transaction details.
  • Change action type #387: Changes to the actionType in the PayRequestLink component within Pay.tsx, directly related to the main PR.
  • Handle link cancel #384: Introduction of a new state for handling canceled requests in the Pay.tsx file, relevant to control flow modifications in the main PR.

Suggested labels

Being worked on


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Oct 3, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
peanut-ui ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 3, 2024 5:40pm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-47: Overall assessment: Changes improve component robustness and alter user flow

The modifications in this file successfully address the PR objectives by:

  1. Enhancing the display of token information with improved fallback logic.
  2. Changing the user flow from sending to requesting payments.

These changes appear to be intentional and well-implemented. However, due to the significant shift in user experience, it's crucial to ensure that this aligns with the broader UX strategy of the application.

Consider documenting this change in user flow in your application's UX documentation or user stories to maintain clarity on the intended user journey.

src/components/Request/Pay/Pay.tsx (4)

Line range hint 65-67: Consider improving error handling

The current error handling only logs to the console. For a better user experience, consider updating the component state to reflect the error and display an appropriate message to the user.

Here's a suggestion for improved error handling:

catch (error) {
    console.error('Failed to fetch request link details:', error)
    setLinkState('ERROR')
    // Optionally, set an error message state to display to the user
    // setErrorMessage('Failed to fetch request link details. Please try again.')
}

Don't forget to add an error view in the component's return statement:

{linkState === 'ERROR' && <generalViews.ErrorView errorMessage={errorMessage} />}

Line range hint 24-31: Consider simplifying state management

The component manages multiple states which could potentially be simplified. Consider creating a custom hook to manage the request link state and related operations. This would improve the readability and maintainability of the component.

Here's a basic example of how you could start refactoring this:

// useRequestLink.ts
export const useRequestLink = () => {
  const [linkState, setLinkState] = useState<_consts.IRequestLinkState>('LOADING')
  const [requestLinkData, setRequestLinkData] = useState<_consts.IRequestLinkData | undefined>(undefined)
  // ... other states

  const checkRequestLink = async (pageUrl: string) => {
    // ... existing logic
  }

  return {
    linkState,
    requestLinkData,
    // ... other states and functions
    checkRequestLink,
  }
}

// In your component
const { linkState, requestLinkData, checkRequestLink } = useRequestLink()

Also applies to: 149-163


Line range hint 65-69: Replace hardcoded API key

The API key is currently hardcoded as 'YOUR_API_KEY'. This is not a secure practice and should be replaced with an environment variable.

Replace the hardcoded API key with an environment variable:

const requestLinkDetails: any = await peanut.getRequestLinkDetails({
    link: pageUrl,
    APIKey: process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_PEANUT_API_KEY,
    apiUrl: '/api/proxy/get',
})

Make sure to add the API key to your environment variables and update your deployment process accordingly.


Line range hint 149-155: Add dependencies to useEffect

The useEffect hook doesn't have any dependencies, which might lead to unnecessary re-renders or missed updates. Consider adding the necessary dependencies.

Update the useEffect hook with the appropriate dependencies:

useEffect(() => {
    const pageUrl = typeof window !== 'undefined' ? window.location.href : ''
    if (pageUrl) {
        checkRequestLink(pageUrl)
    }
}, [checkRequestLink]) // Add checkRequestLink as a dependency

// You might need to wrap checkRequestLink with useCallback to prevent unnecessary re-renders
const checkRequestLink = useCallback(async (pageUrl: string) => {
    // ... existing logic
}, []) // Add any dependencies of checkRequestLink here
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c1cc83 and b1a65f5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/components/Request/Pay/Pay.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx (1)

20-20: LGTM: Improved fallback for token symbol display

The addition of requestLinkData?.tokenAddress as a final fallback option enhances the robustness of the component. This change ensures that some information about the token is always displayed, even if the symbol is not available, which aligns well with the PR objective of showing more request info on the already paid view.

src/components/Request/Pay/Pay.tsx (1)

70-72: Approved: Correct fix for the order of operations issue

This change addresses the PR objective by setting requestLinkData immediately after fetching the request link details. This ensures that the correct data is available when checking the payment status and rendering the "Already Paid" view.

The modification improves the component's behavior without introducing any new variables or altering the existing logic. It's a simple and effective solution to the described issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants