Skip to content

ci(compliance): pin feature-ideation reusable to canonical stub SHA#157

Closed
don-petry wants to merge 0 commit into
mainfrom
claude/issue-151-20260501-1332
Closed

ci(compliance): pin feature-ideation reusable to canonical stub SHA#157
don-petry wants to merge 0 commit into
mainfrom
claude/issue-151-20260501-1332

Conversation

@don-petry
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Updates .github/workflows/feature-ideation.yml to use the SHA from the org-standard canonical stub (petry-projects/.github/standards/workflows/feature-ideation.yml)
  • The old SHA (ee22b427cbce9ecadcf2b436acb57c3adf0cb63d) was replaced with the canonical template SHA (ae9709f4466dec60a5733c9e7487f69dcd004e05 # v1)
  • No other changes — the rest of the file already matched the canonical stub verbatim

Test plan

  • Verify .github/workflows/feature-ideation.yml uses: line matches petry-projects/.github/standards/workflows/feature-ideation.yml exactly
  • Confirm weekly compliance audit no longer flags non-stub-feature-ideation.yml as an error

Closes #151

Generated with Claude Code

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 1, 2026 13:35
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 1, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@github-actions[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 36 seconds before requesting another review.

To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: b4145436-993a-4e48-8875-9c02a6ca8e72

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 66a318b and 246bb85.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/feature-ideation.yml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch claude/issue-151-20260501-1332

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 5 minutes and 36 seconds.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@don-petry
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@don-petry — this PR brings .github/workflows/feature-ideation.yml into compliance with the org standard by updating the reusable workflow SHA to match the canonical stub in petry-projects/.github/standards/workflows/feature-ideation.yml. Ready for your review and merge.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sonarqubecloud Bot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the repository’s Feature Ideation workflow stub to align with the org-standard canonical stub by changing the reusable workflow pin (commit SHA) used in the uses: reference.

Changes:

  • Updated .github/workflows/feature-ideation.yml to point to the canonical reusable workflow commit SHA (ae9709f...) instead of the previous SHA (ee22b42...).

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 7, 2026

Auto-rebase failed — merge conflict — this branch has conflicts with main that must be resolved manually.

Please resolve the conflicts and push:

git fetch origin
git merge origin/main
# resolve conflicts, then:
git add .
git commit
git push

@don-petry don-petry enabled auto-merge (squash) May 12, 2026 01:41
@don-petry don-petry closed this May 13, 2026
auto-merge was automatically disabled May 13, 2026 17:06

Pull request was closed

@don-petry don-petry force-pushed the claude/issue-151-20260501-1332 branch from 246bb85 to e6e0523 Compare May 13, 2026 17:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Compliance: non-stub-feature-ideation.yml

2 participants