Skip to content

chore: standardize CODEOWNERS on @petry-projects/org-leads#153

Merged
don-petry merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/codeowners-org-leads
May 4, 2026
Merged

chore: standardize CODEOWNERS on @petry-projects/org-leads#153
don-petry merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/codeowners-org-leads

Conversation

@don-petry
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Per the org CODEOWNERS standard, replace individual user/bot listings with the @petry-projects/org-leads team.

This unblocks repos with require_code_owner_review: true once the machine user @donpetry-bot is in the team.

Closes the CODEOWNERS gap from pr-review-agent#27.

Per the org-wide standard defined in petry-projects/.github
(standards/codeowners-standard.md), replace individual user/bot
listings with the @petry-projects/org-leads team.

Closes the CODEOWNERS gap from pr-review-agent#27.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 4, 2026 20:34
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sonarqubecloud Bot commented May 4, 2026

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 4, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@don-petry has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 33 minutes and 59 seconds before requesting another review.

To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f4d98aa1-b67b-4c07-8eea-fd4f55ef26d3

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 04aca0e and b8fad5b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/codeowners-org-leads

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 33 minutes and 59 seconds.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@don-petry don-petry merged commit a77f78a into main May 4, 2026
22 checks passed
@don-petry don-petry deleted the chore/codeowners-org-leads branch May 4, 2026 20:36
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Standardizes repository CODEOWNERS to align with the org-wide CODEOWNERS standard by assigning all files to the @petry-projects/org-leads team (instead of individual users/bots), helping satisfy require_code_owner_review: true consistently.

Changes:

  • Replace default CODEOWNERS entries with a single @petry-projects/org-leads team owner.
  • Update CODEOWNERS header comments to reference the org standard.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread .github/CODEOWNERS
Comment on lines +2 to +3
# Standard: use the @petry-projects/org-leads team for all code owner
# assignments. See petry-projects/.github standards/codeowners-standard.md
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants