Support for HTTP PATCH in the built-in webserver - #190
Conversation
|
Patch and test looks good. Would you mind adding the Method Not Allowed change as well? |
|
I could definitely take a look at it. Well, I already did, but decided against doing it in this PR, because it requires some changes outside the parser as well. I thought it would be better to keep patches as small as possible. How would you feel if I were to submit that as a separate PR, or would you like to include it in this one? Actually, looking at RFC 2616, chapter 5.1.1 states as follows:
So it's really 501 which should be returned for unknown methods. But the mechanics remain unchanged. The same section also mentions the |
|
Separate PR is fine as well. And you are right, 501 is correct here. |
|
Looks good to me. Nice, simple, to the point... |
|
Alright, will take of it this weekend. Checked with stas, we also merge into 5.4 |
|
@nikcorg could you rebase and squash your commits? |
|
@lstrojny I've never used rebase before and it looks a bit like black magic, but I'll do my best... A bit worried after reading this:
|
|
@nikcorg Check this: http://gitready.com/advanced/2009/02/10/squashing-commits-with-rebase.html In your case it would be: $ git rebase -i HEAD~2Later just |
Added support for the HTTP PATCH method Added test for HTTP PATCH method support
|
@stloyd Thanks. I got the rebase done ok (I think), but I missed the Why is it adding commits when I squash them? In my Edit: No wait, it seems to have fixed itself. Thanks a lot for your help! |
|
@nikcorg the pull/push applied the remote changes again on top of your repo. Have a look at the history (git log), than do git reset --hard to the squashed commit. And than do git push --force. |
|
@lstrojny Thanks, I'll do that next time. The log looks fine now, except the commit for the squash is now a bit strange, since I rebased twice. Oh well. You live and you learn, collecting bruises and scratches every chance you get. |
|
I’m a little behind my schedule. Give me a few days more and it will be merged. |
|
Sure thing, no worries. |
|
Comment on behalf of lstrojny at php.net: Merged in 5.4 and master. |
|
any reason why it was cherrpicked instead of properly merged, resulting in loosing the commit message and author? |
* 'PHP-5.4' of git.php.net:php-src: (367 commits) fix unix/win dir separators Fix bug #63173: Crash when invoking invalid array callback Correct the test summary Fixed bug #60723 (error_log error time has changed to UTC ignoring default timezo) Fixed bug #60723 (error_log error time has changed to UTC ignoring default timezo) Avoid calling select if maxfd returned by curl_multi_fdset is -1 Fixing NEWS file Fixed bug #63111 (is_callable() lies for abstract static method) updated lib versions Fix folding fix bug #63015 (Incorrect arginfo for DOMErrorHandler) Bug #63000: MCAST_JOIN_GROUP on OSX is broken Fixed bug #61442 (exception threw in __autoload can not be catched) Merging PR #116 Merged GitHub PR #190: Support for the HTTP PATCH method in CLI webserver updated libary versions split tests for the new zlib version on win Fixed Bug #63103 (ext\curl\tests\bug62839.phpt broken) update news Support building PHP with the native client toolchain. ...
|
@dsp Otherwise I can’t commit the NEWS file entry with it. |
|
@lstrojny Sure, pull the branch, add a commit on top of it, merge the branch. |
… PHP-5.4 * 'PHP-5.4' of https://git.php.net/repository/php-src: Merging PR #116 Merged GitHub PR #190: Support for the HTTP PATCH method in CLI webserver updated libary versions split tests for the new zlib version on win Fixed Bug #63103 (ext\curl\tests\bug62839.phpt broken)
* 'master' of https://git.php.net/repository/php-src: Merging PR #116 Merged GitHub PR #190: Support for the HTTP PATCH method in CLI webserver updated libary versions split tests for the new zlib version on win Fixed Bug #63103 (ext\curl\tests\bug62839.phpt broken)
I wanted to experiment using the HTTP PATCH method (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5789), so I added it to the http parser for the built-in webserver. Perhaps someone else would benefit from this as well.
Somewhat related to Bug #61679 (https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61679), but this PR does not add the behaviour of returning 405 for unsupported methods.