Skip to content

Conversation

@devnexen
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@devnexen devnexen requested a review from Girgias February 28, 2024 08:39
@devnexen devnexen marked this pull request as ready for review February 28, 2024 08:39
@devnexen
Copy link
Member Author

ping :)

@Girgias
Copy link
Member

Girgias commented Apr 24, 2024

I don't really know database stuff :/ was this the PR that got reverted?

@devnexen
Copy link
Member Author

yes :) alright will ask Saki :)

@devnexen devnexen requested a review from SakiTakamachi April 24, 2024 22:44
@Girgias Girgias removed their request for review April 24, 2024 22:44
Copy link
Member

@SakiTakamachi SakiTakamachi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMHO, this might be better targeted at master. This may break existing applications that depend on this "weird behavior".

Comment on lines +592 to +595
if (!update) {
PGG(num_links)++;
PGG(num_persistent)++;
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this "if" mean that it will not increment if the connection is closed in L600 to L610?

Personally, I think it would be better to decrement when the connection is closed in L600 to L610, rather than placing an "if" here.

@devnexen devnexen closed this Apr 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants