-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
Add results to show that pseudometrizable implies 1st countable #244
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| uid: P000144 | ||
| slug: locally-pseudometrizable | ||
| name: Locally pseudometrizable | ||
| refs: | ||
| - doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1969-0251719-4 | ||
| name: TODO | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Every point has a neighborhood that is {P121}. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,14 +1,12 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| uid: T000057 | ||
| if: | ||
| P000121: true | ||
| P000144: true | ||
| then: | ||
| P000028: true | ||
| refs: | ||
| - doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-6290-9 | ||
| name: Counterexamples in Topology | ||
| - mathse: 4659902 | ||
| name: How can the implication metrizable -> first countable be generalized? | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| If $X$ is pseudometric, for any $x \in X$, $\{B(x,\frac{1}{n})\,|\,n \in \omega\}$ is a countable local base at $x$. | ||
|
|
||
| Asserted on page 34-35 of {{doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-6290-9}} for metric spaces. The same holds for pseudometric spaces. | ||
| Take a pseduometrizable neighborhood. The balls of rational radius within this neighborhood form a local basis. | ||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| uid: T000326 | ||
| if: | ||
| P000121: true | ||
| then: | ||
| P000144: true | ||
| refs: | ||
StevenClontz marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| - mathse: 4659902 | ||
| name: How can the implication metrizable -> first countable be generalized? | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| The entire space is the desired neighborhood. | ||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| uid: T000327 | ||
| if: | ||
| P000082: true | ||
| then: | ||
| P000144: true | ||
| refs: | ||
| - mathse: 4659902 | ||
| name: How can the implication metrizable -> first countable be generalized? | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Every metric is a pseduometric. |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't catch this before accepting the pull request, but "pseudometrizable" is misspelled; it appears as "pseduometrizable"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll make a hotfix for this directly on main.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems T327 has the same missplelling.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed now in 70e67cd. I'm okay if maintainers/reviewers do trivial (literally one line) typo changes directly on main.
Go to e.g. https://github.com/pi-base/data/blob/main/theorems/T000327.md click the pencil icon to get a quick editor, make the fix, change the commit message to say "fixed typo" (I forgot to do this at 70e67cd), then commit directly to main.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure it would let me do this. Just to check, I clicked on the pencil icon and at the bottom it says "you can't commit to main, because it's a protected branch. Create a new branch for this commit and start a pull request."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops. I guess that might be an admin-only feature. So in that case I still recommend the workflow when convenient, but rather than committing to main, create a "patch" branch and open a PR that can be quickly reviewed/accepted by others.