-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
fix(billing): cumulative review — refund correlation + cleanup #3543
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ describe('Billing webhook checkout unit tests:', () => { | |
| let mockSubscriptionRepository; | ||
| let mockOrganizationRepository; | ||
| let mockExtraService; | ||
| let mockStripeInstance; | ||
|
|
||
| const orgId = '507f1f77bcf86cd799439011'; | ||
| const subId = '607f1f77bcf86cd799439022'; | ||
|
|
@@ -39,6 +40,12 @@ describe('Billing webhook checkout unit tests:', () => { | |
| refundPartial: jest.fn(), | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| mockStripeInstance = { | ||
| paymentIntents: { | ||
| update: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({}), | ||
| }, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| jest.unstable_mockModule('../repositories/billing.subscription.repository.js', () => ({ | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ⚪ LOW RISK Nitpick: Duplicated mock setups identified. Extracting these into a shared utility would improve maintainability. |
||
| default: mockSubscriptionRepository, | ||
| })); | ||
|
|
@@ -66,6 +73,10 @@ describe('Billing webhook checkout unit tests:', () => { | |
| default: { emit: jest.fn() }, | ||
| })); | ||
|
|
||
| jest.unstable_mockModule('../lib/stripe.js', () => ({ | ||
| default: jest.fn(() => mockStripeInstance), | ||
| })); | ||
|
|
||
| jest.unstable_mockModule('../../../config/index.js', () => ({ | ||
| default: { | ||
| billing: { plans: ['free', 'starter', 'pro', 'enterprise'] }, | ||
|
|
@@ -220,6 +231,59 @@ describe('Billing webhook checkout unit tests:', () => { | |
|
|
||
| expect(mockExtraService.creditPack).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('should call stripe.paymentIntents.update with real sessionId after creditPack succeeds (CRITICAL: refund correlation)', async () => { | ||
| const paymentIntentId = 'pi_test_abc123'; | ||
|
|
||
| await BillingWebhookService.handleCheckoutPaymentCompleted({ | ||
| id: stripeSessionId, | ||
| payment_status: 'paid', | ||
| payment_intent: paymentIntentId, | ||
| metadata: { organizationId: orgId, packId: 'pack_500k', kind: 'extras' }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(mockExtraService.creditPack).toHaveBeenCalledWith(orgId, 'pack_500k', stripeSessionId); | ||
| expect(mockStripeInstance.paymentIntents.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith( | ||
| paymentIntentId, | ||
| { | ||
| metadata: { | ||
| organizationId: orgId, | ||
| packId: 'pack_500k', | ||
| kind: 'extras', | ||
| stripeSessionId, // real cs_* ID (not '__pending__') | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| ); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('should skip paymentIntents.update when payment_intent is absent', async () => { | ||
| await BillingWebhookService.handleCheckoutPaymentCompleted({ | ||
| id: stripeSessionId, | ||
| payment_status: 'paid', | ||
| // payment_intent omitted — e.g. in test fixtures without PI | ||
| metadata: { organizationId: orgId, packId: 'pack_500k', kind: 'extras' }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(mockExtraService.creditPack).toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(mockStripeInstance.paymentIntents.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('should not throw when paymentIntents.update fails (non-fatal fallback)', async () => { | ||
| const paymentIntentId = 'pi_test_failing'; | ||
| mockStripeInstance.paymentIntents.update.mockRejectedValue(new Error('Stripe API error')); | ||
|
|
||
| await expect( | ||
| BillingWebhookService.handleCheckoutPaymentCompleted({ | ||
| id: stripeSessionId, | ||
| payment_status: 'paid', | ||
| payment_intent: paymentIntentId, | ||
| metadata: { organizationId: orgId, packId: 'pack_500k', kind: 'extras' }, | ||
| }), | ||
| ).resolves.toBeUndefined(); | ||
|
|
||
| // creditPack should still have run despite the PI update failure | ||
| expect(mockExtraService.creditPack).toHaveBeenCalledWith(orgId, 'pack_500k', stripeSessionId); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| describe('handleCheckoutCompleted (mode=subscription)', () => { | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟡 MEDIUM RISK
Suggestion: This metadata backfill is a robust solution for the 'correlation' problem. By propagating the 'stripeSessionId' and 'packId' to the PaymentIntent, you ensure future events (like refunds) can be mapped back to internal ledger entries. Suggestion: Consider if additional metadata like 'userId' or 'environment' should also be propagated to improve long-term auditability.