Replace node number with node count#20811
Replace node number with node count#20811ti-chi-bot[bot] merged 2 commits intopingcap:release-8.1from
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @yahonda, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request replaces the term "node number" with "node count" in the tidb-cloud/size-your-cluster.md file. The change aims to improve clarity and accuracy when referring to the quantity of TiDB, TiKV, and TiFlash nodes in a TiDB Cloud Dedicated cluster. The author indicates that this change is translated from a similar change in the documentation repository.
Highlights
- Terminology Update: Replaces all instances of "node number" with "node count" in the
tidb-cloud/size-your-cluster.mdfile for improved clarity. - Consistency: Ensures consistent use of "node count" when referring to the quantity of TiDB, TiKV, and TiFlash nodes.
- Formula Update: Updates formulas to use
node countinstead ofnode numfor calculating the required number of nodes.
Changelog
- tidb-cloud/size-your-cluster.md
- Replaced 'node number' with 'node count' in the introduction.
- Updated the section describing TiDB configuration to use 'node count'.
- Modified the formula for estimating TiDB nodes to use 'node count'.
- Replaced 'node number' with 'node count' in the TiKV section.
- Updated the section describing TiKV configuration to use 'node count'.
- Modified the formulas for estimating TiKV nodes based on data volume and expected performance to use 'node count'.
- Replaced 'node number' with 'node count' in the TiFlash section.
- Updated the section describing TiFlash configuration to use 'node count'.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
A count, not a number,
Nodes in the cloud we lumber,
Clear terms we embrace,
In the digital space,
For clusters that slumber.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
ti-chi-bot
Bot
added
missing-translation-status
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request aims to improve the clarity of the documentation by replacing the term "node number" with "node count" in the context of TiDB Cloud cluster sizing. This change makes the documentation more intuitive and aligned with the intended meaning. The changes are straightforward and consistently applied across the relevant sections of the document.
Merge Readiness
The changes in this pull request are well-scoped and improve the clarity of the documentation. Given the straightforward nature of the changes and the absence of any identified issues at the critical, high, or medium severity levels based on the instructions, the pull request appears ready for merging. However, I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and other reviewers should also examine the changes before merging.
hfxsd
added
translation/no-need
|
/cc @Oreoxmt |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hfxsd The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
3 participants
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
The current "node number" refers to the specific identification or label given to each instance. "node count" should refers to the quantity or count of instances, that is needed here. I think "the number of TiDB/TiFlash nodes" are fine.
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
Tips for choosing the affected version(s):
By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.
For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions.
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
node numberwithnode count#20549Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?