Skip to content

Conversation

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This is an automated cherry-pick of #20832

First-time contributors' checklist

What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)

Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)

Tips for choosing the affected version(s):

By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.

For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions.

  • master (the latest development version)
  • v9.0 (TiDB 9.0 versions)
  • v8.5 (TiDB 8.5 versions)
  • v8.4 (TiDB 8.4 versions)
  • v8.3 (TiDB 8.3 versions)
  • v8.1 (TiDB 8.1 versions)
  • v7.5 (TiDB 7.5 versions)
  • v7.1 (TiDB 7.1 versions)
  • v6.5 (TiDB 6.5 versions)
  • v6.1 (TiDB 6.1 versions)
  • v5.4 (TiDB 5.4 versions)

What is the related PR or file link(s)?

  • This PR is translated from:
  • Other reference link(s):

Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?

  • Delete files
  • Change aliases
  • Need modification after applied to another branch
  • Might cause conflicts after applied to another branch

Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. first-time-contributor Indicates that the PR was contributed by an external member and is a first-time contributor. lgtm needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-7.5 This PR is cherry-picked to release-7.5 from a source PR. labels Apr 23, 2025
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot mentioned this pull request Apr 23, 2025
16 tasks
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

@zeminzhou This PR has conflicts, I have hold it.
Please resolve them or ask others to resolve them, then comment /unhold to remove the hold label.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @ti-chi-bot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request is an automated cherry-pick of #20832. It updates the documentation for TiDB to reflect the availability of the IMPORT INTO feature in TiDB Cloud Serverless, and to remove notes indicating that certain import-related features are unavailable on TiDB Cloud Serverless. Specifically, it modifies sql-statement-cancel-import-job.md, sql-statement-import-into.md, and sql-statement-show-import-job.md.

Highlights

  • Serverless Support: The pull request updates documentation to reflect the availability of IMPORT INTO in TiDB Cloud Serverless.
  • Feature Availability: The pull request removes notes indicating that CANCEL IMPORT, SHOW IMPORT, and Global Sort are unavailable on TiDB Cloud Serverless.
  • Storage Locations: The pull request clarifies supported storage locations for IMPORT INTO ... FROM FILE in different TiDB Cloud tiers.

Changelog

  • sql-statements/sql-statement-cancel-import-job.md
    • Removed the note indicating that CANCEL IMPORT is not available on TiDB Cloud Serverless.
  • sql-statements/sql-statement-import-into.md
    • Added information about supported storage locations for IMPORT INTO ... FROM FILE in TiDB Self-Managed, TiDB Cloud Dedicated, and TiDB Cloud Serverless.
    • Clarified that Amazon S3 and Alibaba Cloud OSS are supported for TiDB Cloud Serverless.
    • Added information about the TiDB Distributed eXecution Framework (DXF) and its impact on IMPORT INTO performance.
    • Removed the warning indicating that Global Sort is experimental.
    • Added a note indicating that Global Sort is not available on TiDB Cloud Serverless.
  • sql-statements/sql-statement-show-import-job.md
    • Removed the note indicating that SHOW IMPORT is not available on TiDB Cloud Serverless.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 23, 2025
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request aims to add serverless support for the IMPORT INTO statement. The changes involve removing notes indicating the unavailability of certain features on TiDB Cloud Serverless clusters and adding information about supported storage options for different TiDB Cloud tiers. Overall, the changes seem reasonable, but there are some areas that could be improved for clarity and consistency.

Summary of Findings

  • Inconsistent Terminology: The phrase IMPORT INTO ... FROM FILE is used in some places but not others. It would be good to standardize on one or the other.
  • Merge Conflicts: The diffs contain merge conflict markers (<<<<<<< HEAD, =======, >>>>>>>) that need to be resolved before merging.
  • Style Guide Adherence: There are some instances where the writing style could be improved to adhere to the documentation style guide, particularly regarding clarity and simplicity.[^1]

Merge Readiness

The pull request is not ready for merging due to the presence of merge conflict markers. These must be resolved first. Additionally, addressing the other comments regarding clarity and style would improve the overall quality of the documentation. I am unable to approve this pull request, and recommend that another reviewer approves this code before merging.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Apr 23, 2025

@gemini-code-assist[bot]: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files.

In response to this:

Code Review

The pull request aims to add serverless support for the IMPORT INTO statement. The changes involve removing notes indicating the unavailability of certain features on TiDB Cloud Serverless clusters and adding information about supported storage options for different TiDB Cloud tiers. Overall, the changes seem reasonable, but there are some areas that could be improved for clarity and consistency.

Summary of Findings

  • Inconsistent Terminology: The phrase IMPORT INTO ... FROM FILE is used in some places but not others. It would be good to standardize on one or the other.
  • Merge Conflicts: The diffs contain merge conflict markers (<<<<<<< HEAD, =======, >>>>>>>) that need to be resolved before merging.
  • Style Guide Adherence: There are some instances where the writing style could be improved to adhere to the documentation style guide, particularly regarding clarity and simplicity.[^1]

Merge Readiness

The pull request is not ready for merging due to the presence of merge conflict markers. These must be resolved first. Additionally, addressing the other comments regarding clarity and style would improve the overall quality of the documentation. I am unable to approve this pull request, and recommend that another reviewer approves this code before merging.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 23, 2025
@qiancai qiancai removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 23, 2025
@qiancai
Copy link
Collaborator

qiancai commented Apr 23, 2025

/approve

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Apr 23, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: qiancai

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Apr 23, 2025
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 0be3e45 into pingcap:release-7.5 Apr 23, 2025
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved first-time-contributor Indicates that the PR was contributed by an external member and is a first-time contributor. lgtm needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-7.5 This PR is cherry-picked to release-7.5 from a source PR.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants