Skip to content

Conversation

@hfxsd
Copy link
Collaborator

@hfxsd hfxsd commented Oct 11, 2025

First-time contributors' checklist

What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)

Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)

Tips for choosing the affected version(s):

By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.

For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions.

  • master (the latest development version)
  • v9.0 (TiDB 9.0 versions)
  • v8.5 (TiDB 8.5 versions)
  • v8.1 (TiDB 8.1 versions)
  • v7.5 (TiDB 7.5 versions)
  • v7.1 (TiDB 7.1 versions)
  • v6.5 (TiDB 6.5 versions)
  • v6.1 (TiDB 6.1 versions)
  • v5.4 (TiDB 5.4 versions)

What is the related PR or file link(s)?

  • This PR is translated from:
  • Other reference link(s):

Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?

  • Delete files
  • Change aliases
  • Need modification after applied to another branch
  • Might cause conflicts after applied to another branch

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the contribution This PR is from a community contributor. label Oct 11, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @hfxsd, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the best-practices-for-security-configuration.md document to ensure its accuracy regarding TiDB's default listening ports. It specifically addresses and corrects an outdated reference to 'TiFlow' by replacing it with the current and relevant components: 'DM master', 'DM worker', and 'TiCDC'. This change helps maintain the integrity and relevance of the security documentation for users across various TiDB versions.

Highlights

  • Removed Outdated Component: All mentions of 'TiFlow' and its associated default listening ports have been removed from the security configuration best practices documentation.
  • Added Current Components: The documentation now accurately includes 'DM master', 'DM worker', and 'TiCDC' components with their respective default listening ports, replacing the outdated 'TiFlow' entries.
  • Documentation Formatting: Minor formatting adjustments have been applied to the table headers and port entries within the best-practices-for-security-configuration.md file for improved consistency.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added missing-translation-status This PR does not have translation status info. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 11, 2025
@hfxsd hfxsd added translation/done This PR has been translated from English into Chinese and updated to pingcap/docs-cn in a PR. and removed missing-translation-status This PR does not have translation status info. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. contribution This PR is from a community contributor. labels Oct 11, 2025
@hfxsd hfxsd self-assigned this Oct 11, 2025
@hfxsd hfxsd added needs-cherry-pick-release-6.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-6.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.5 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.5 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-8.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-8.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.5 branch. labels Oct 11, 2025
@hfxsd hfxsd requested review from kennytm and qiancai October 11, 2025 07:43
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly replaces the outdated "TiFlow" term with the more specific component names "DM master", "DM worker", and "TiCDC" in the security best practices documentation. This improves the accuracy and clarity of the document. I've also provided a few suggestions to improve the formatting and alignment of the markdown table for better readability and consistency.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Oct 11, 2025

@wk989898: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Oct 11, 2025

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2025-10-11 08:01:43.57397646 +0000 UTC m=+513692.605075788: ☑️ agreed by qiancai.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. label Oct 11, 2025
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 11, 2025
@hfxsd hfxsd added the lgtm label Oct 11, 2025
@hfxsd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hfxsd commented Oct 11, 2025

/approve

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Oct 11, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hfxsd

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Oct 11, 2025
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 9276cf6 into pingcap:master Oct 11, 2025
9 checks passed
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.5: #21887.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.1: #21888.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.5: #21889.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-6.1: #21890.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-6.5: #21891.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.1: #21892.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved lgtm needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. needs-cherry-pick-release-6.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-6.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.5 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.5 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-8.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-8.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.5 branch. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. translation/done This PR has been translated from English into Chinese and updated to pingcap/docs-cn in a PR.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove mention of "TiFlow" from "Best Practices for TiDB Security Configuration"

4 participants