Skip to content

nontransactional dml FAQ about alias (#22523)#22535

Merged
ti-chi-bot[bot] merged 2 commits intopingcap:release-6.5from
ti-chi-bot:cherry-pick-22523-to-release-6.5
Mar 6, 2026
Merged

nontransactional dml FAQ about alias (#22523)#22535
ti-chi-bot[bot] merged 2 commits intopingcap:release-6.5from
ti-chi-bot:cherry-pick-22523-to-release-6.5

Conversation

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This is an automated cherry-pick of #22523

First-time contributors' checklist

What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)

Added FAQ about Unknown column error when using alias.

Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)

Tips for choosing the affected version(s):

By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.

For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions (in Chinese).

  • master (the latest development version)
  • v9.0 (TiDB 9.0 versions)
  • v8.5 (TiDB 8.5 versions)
  • v8.1 (TiDB 8.1 versions)
  • v7.5 (TiDB 7.5 versions)
  • v7.1 (TiDB 7.1 versions)
  • v6.5 (TiDB 6.5 versions)
  • v6.1 (TiDB 6.1 versions)
  • v5.4 (TiDB 5.4 versions)

What is the related PR or file link(s)?

Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?

  • Delete files
  • Change aliases
  • Need modification after applied to another branch
  • Might cause conflicts after applied to another branch

Oreoxmt and others added 2 commits March 6, 2026 02:56
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added lgtm needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-6.5 This PR is cherry-picked to release-6.5 from a source PR. labels Mar 6, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the TiDB documentation by addressing a common Unknown column error encountered when using table aliases within non-transactional DML statements. It provides detailed explanations and recommendations to help users avoid this issue, improving clarity and user experience for complex SQL operations.

Highlights

  • New FAQ for non-transactional DML: Added a detailed FAQ section to non-transactional-dml.md explaining the Unknown column error when using table aliases in non-transactional DML statements, along with recommendations to avoid it.
  • Alias usage warning in BATCH statements: Incorporated a note into sql-statements/sql-statement-batch.md to warn users about potential Unknown column errors when using table aliases with BATCH statements due to internal statement rewriting.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • non-transactional-dml.md
    • Added a new FAQ section titled "The Unknown column '<alias>.<column>' in 'where clause' error occurs when using table aliases in non-transactional DML statements".
    • Provided an explanation of why the error occurs (aliases not preserved during internal rewriting).
    • Included an example SQL statement that might trigger the error.
    • Offered recommendations to avoid the error, such as not using table aliases or using DRY RUN to preview statements.
  • sql-statements/sql-statement-batch.md
    • Inserted a Note block explaining that BATCH statements might not preserve table aliases, leading to Unknown column errors.
    • Advised users to avoid table aliases and use DRY RUN QUERY or DRY RUN for preview.
    • Linked to the more detailed explanation in non-transactional-dml.md.
Activity
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a new FAQ section to the non-transactional DML documentation, explaining a potential Unknown column error when using table aliases. It also adds a note about this issue to the BATCH statement documentation. The changes are clear and helpful for users. I've provided a couple of minor suggestions to improve the wording for better clarity and conciseness, following the repository's documentation style guide.

Note: Security Review has been skipped due to the limited scope of the PR.


When you execute a non-transactional DML statement, TiDB internally constructs a query for dividing batches and then generates the actual split execution statements. You can use [`DRY RUN QUERY`](/non-transactional-dml.md#query-the-batch-dividing-statement) and [`DRY RUN`](/non-transactional-dml.md#query-the-statements-corresponding-to-the-first-and-the-last-batches) to view these two types of statements, respectively.

In the current version, the rewritten statements might not preserve the table aliases from the original DML statement. Therefore, if you use the `<alias>.<column>` format to reference columns in a `WHERE` clause or other expressions, an `Unknown column` error might occur.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

low

This sentence can be rephrased for better clarity and conciseness, and to remove the vague phrase 'In the current version'.

Suggested change
In the current version, the rewritten statements might not preserve the table aliases from the original DML statement. Therefore, if you use the `<alias>.<column>` format to reference columns in a `WHERE` clause or other expressions, an `Unknown column` error might occur.
Because the rewritten statements might not preserve the table aliases from the original DML statement, you might get an `Unknown column` error if you use the `<alias>.<column>` format to reference columns in a `WHERE` clause or other expressions.
References
  1. The style guide recommends writing in the second person ('you'), avoiding unnecessary words, and being direct. This suggestion rephrases the sentence to be more active and concise, removing the vague phrase 'In the current version'. (link)


> **Note:**
>
> The `BATCH` statement is internally rewritten and split into multiple DML statements during execution. In the current version, table aliases might not be preserved, which can result in errors such as `Unknown column '<alias>.<column>' in 'where clause'`. To avoid this issue, do not use table aliases. Before execution, use `DRY RUN QUERY` or `DRY RUN` to preview the split statements before execution. For more information, see [Non-Transactional DML Statements](/non-transactional-dml.md).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

low

This note can be improved for clarity and conciseness. The phrase 'In the current version' is vague, and 'before execution' is repeated. This suggestion rephrases the note to be more direct and easier to read.

Suggested change
> The `BATCH` statement is internally rewritten and split into multiple DML statements during execution. In the current version, table aliases might not be preserved, which can result in errors such as `Unknown column '<alias>.<column>' in 'where clause'`. To avoid this issue, do not use table aliases. Before execution, use `DRY RUN QUERY` or `DRY RUN` to preview the split statements before execution. For more information, see [Non-Transactional DML Statements](/non-transactional-dml.md).
> The `BATCH` statement is internally rewritten and split into multiple DML statements during execution. These rewritten statements might not preserve table aliases, which can result in errors such as `Unknown column '<alias>.<column>' in 'where clause'`. To avoid this issue, do not use table aliases. You can use `DRY RUN QUERY` or `DRY RUN` to preview the split statements before execution. For more information, see [Non-Transactional DML Statements](/non-transactional-dml.md).
References
  1. The style guide recommends avoiding unnecessary words and repetition. This suggestion removes the repeated phrase 'before execution' and the vague phrase 'In the current version' to improve readability and conciseness. (link)

@Oreoxmt
Copy link
Collaborator

Oreoxmt commented Mar 6, 2026

/approve

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Mar 6, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Oreoxmt

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Mar 6, 2026
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 3cbdb23 into pingcap:release-6.5 Mar 6, 2026
8 of 9 checks passed
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot deleted the cherry-pick-22523-to-release-6.5 branch March 6, 2026 04:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved lgtm needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-6.5 This PR is cherry-picked to release-6.5 from a source PR.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants