[Feature]: Add Orchestration/Delegation #6741
Replies: 3 comments
|
|
The smallest useful scope here is probably not 'cross-provider orchestration' in the abstract, but one bounded handoff contract. Something like:
Without that, multi-provider orchestration can look powerful while mostly just multiplying retries and context drift. The hard part is not getting model A to call model B. It is making each handoff explicit enough that you can tell whether the chain is actually improving the work. MartinLoop keeps reinforcing that for me: orchestration becomes much more useful once every hop has a stop rule and a receipt instead of just another prompt. If you build the first slice, I’d bias toward one planner -> implementer -> review path before adding broader arbitrary delegation. |
|
our new orchestrator (#2829) will have all of this |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Before submitting
Area
apps/web
Problem or use case
t3code have native support for major provider but lacks the proper communication between then, its currenctly serving as a QoL app rather than a Real power full workhorse
Proposed solution
implement dispatching cross provider agents and orchestration
Why this matters
It matters because it trasnforms T3code from just a conveiniece to a real powerhouse in code geenration.
Smallest useful scope
a model can signal an another provider models to start implementation or start a review.
Alternatives considered
No response
Risks or tradeoffs
No response
Examples or references
No response
Contribution
All reactions