Skip to content

As an User I want a pipeline run be triggered automatically after I push code to my (central) code repository, so my changes are automatically pulled through the pipeline #13

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Sep 28, 2013
Merged

As an User I want a pipeline run be triggered automatically after I push code to my (central) code repository, so my changes are automatically pulled through the pipeline #13

merged 16 commits into from
Sep 28, 2013

Conversation

@pvdissel
Copy link
Member

@pvdissel pvdissel commented Aug 25, 2013

As an User
I want a pipeline run be triggered automatically after I push code to my (central) code repository
so my changes are automatically pulled through the pipeline

Acceptance criteria

  • Must be a separate micro-service called 'pipe-listener'
  • Must accept GitHub Post-Receive Hooks calls (HTTP POST)
  • Must be standalone, not depending on an external webapp container like Tomcat (eg. use embedded Jetty instead)
  • Must clone each triggered pipeline into a separate directory
  • Must use 'pipe' as the pipeline runner
  • Must be able to execute multiple pipelines in parallel

@ghost ghost assigned pvdissel Aug 25, 2013
@pvdissel
Change State of the project to be less focussed on me, instead focuss…
49fc427 
…ed on the project
@pvdissel
Restructured to be a multi-project build, pipe being the first project
c2a40ea
@pvdissel
Added pipe-listener module. Also added '.pipe' to the package of the …
544c166 
…pipe project, it needed it
@pvdissel
Build now checks if Java 7 Compatible JVM is used, fails build otherwise
e81217d
@pvdissel
Got basic HTTP REST API working with ratpack, still does nothing with…
2f6d13a 
… the github webhook post-request
@pvdissel
Merge branch 'pipe-listener' of github.com:pvdissel/pipeline into pip…
0fdb32a 
…e-listener

Conflicts:
	README.md
@pvdissel
Replaced ratpack with dropwizard
e1cc443
@pvdissel
Got basic DropWizard framework working
b2eecf1 
Started implementing ProvidersResource which genericly supports specific WebHook providers, like GitHubWebHook.
Simple GET works. POST functionality still needs to be implemented, incl. accepting specific WebHook formats from the specific providers.
@pvdissel
Implemented basic GitHubWebHook receiver
1e239f4 
Removed the overengineered provider code, back to basics, just basic GitHubWebHookResource.
@pvdissel
Implemented eventbus and eventhandling for git, but GitWorker needs m…
d8c2929 
…ore work
@pvdissel
Renamed subprojects to runner and listener
98bd9bf
@pvdissel
Renamed runner package to runner
aa2cd69
@pvdissel
Added pipe-runner command to GitWorker
66a0108
@pvdissel
Fix typo in readme
4fb45f9
@pvdissel
Github webhook now working in real-life test
eeba10b
@pvdissel
Convert http(s) github urls to github ssh urls
b10c52c 
To support private repositories cloning with public-private-key authentication, we're now converting the Github http(s) urls from the payload to github ssh urls.
@pvdissel
Copy link
Member Author

pvdissel commented Sep 28, 2013

Ready for merging 👯

pvdissel added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2013
@pvdissel
Merged #13 in, now supporting github webhooks and failing the pipelin…
e00ba4e 
…e as soon as a stage fails
@pvdissel pvdissel merged commit b10c52c into pipelinecd:master Sep 28, 2013
@pvdissel pvdissel deleted the pipe-listener branch September 28, 2013 13:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

@pvdissel pvdissel

Labels

story

Projects

None yet

Milestone

v0.1.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@pvdissel