fix(fixup): verify yaml key for skip: fix-patchelf and fix-machos#189
fix(fixup): verify yaml key for skip: fix-patchelf and fix-machos#189mxcl merged 6 commits intopkgxdev:mainfrom
skip: fix-patchelf and fix-machos#189Conversation
|
Definitely need to make all the formatting changes in a different branch if desired. We should probably have a yaml key for skip-patchelf and skip-fix-machos. |
a815e0b to
475ebe2
Compare
fluentci.ioskip-patchelf and skip-fix-machos
|
I've added a check of the new yaml keys |
|
I love it. Moves it to the yaml. Any concerns, @mxcl? |
0d9af84 to
7fb63b7
Compare
|
Why are we skipping? I prefer to fix the problem than work around it. If possible. |
|
deno-built binaries can't have fix-elf.ts run on them, or it breaks the DATA segment look up, and they just become bloated deno binaries. it would let us generalize: brewkit/share/brewkit/fix-elf.ts Lines 26 to 34 in a9c140e and give us a path when similar issues are found in the fix-machos.rb side. |
will require build.skip-patchelf: true being added to these packages in pantry
|
Agreed, though I was looking for explanation for this pacakge? Does it use I think a more suitable syntax here would be And we can do even better for v2 with some kind of composable build steps system. |
|
yup, deno. this is our third, but surely far from our last. your skip |
|
I wonder if these other deno packages had the same problem as we did packaging for homebrew core? |
skip-patchelf and skip-fix-machosskip: patchelf and fix-machos
skip: patchelf and fix-machosskip: fix-patchelf and fix-machos
mxcl
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm! many thanks for a great patch
|
re: that test failure: I don't know where we're finding that pip tag. I think it must have been deleted, but the api is still serving it. |
|
Crossing fingers that the build failure is nothing to do with this since it seems impossible it was. |
fixes pkgxdev/pantry#3724