Skip to content

Conversation

@mauritsvanrees
Copy link
Member

@mauritsvanrees mauritsvanrees commented Dec 10, 2025

For technical review, I tag @davisagli @gforcada @petschki.

I have fixed most Vale feedback, except these, which I don't know how to write better:

venv/bin/vale --no-wrap  docs/backend/upgrading/version-specific-migration/upgrade-to-62.md

 docs/backend/upgrading/version-specific-migration/upgrade-to-62.md
 33:11  suggestion  'is deprecated' looks like passive voice.    Microsoft.Passive         
 33:44  suggestion  'be removed' looks like passive voice.       Microsoft.Passive         
 62:29  warning     Avoid using acronyms in a title or heading.  Microsoft.HeadingAcronyms 

That last one is for "Classic UI" in the last header, I think.


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://plone6--2002.org.readthedocs.build/

Specifically this page: /backend/upgrading/version-specific-migration/upgrade-to-62.

@stevepiercy
Copy link
Contributor

You can ignore Vale warnings and suggestions, but errors should get a look. As part of my routine maintenance, I try to address the errors and reduce them. There's a long way to go yet, so the only thing I really care about for now is to not introduce new errors. Often it turns out to be a candidate for a new term in the glossary, and sometimes it's just some bad MyST markup.

I'll do a thorough editorial review in the next day or so, after the smart people do a technical review. Thanks for the PR!

gforcada
gforcada previously approved these changes Dec 11, 2025
Copy link
Member

@gforcada gforcada left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice write up!

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from New to Approved in Plone Documentation Dec 11, 2025
petschki
petschki previously approved these changes Dec 12, 2025
Copy link
Member

@petschki petschki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @mauritsvanrees ... currently there is nothing more to say for the template movements. Progress is tracked here plone/Products.CMFPlone#3953

Copy link
Contributor

@stevepiercy stevepiercy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor tweaks, and a question and suggestion for reference to Python docs. I'm not sure if I got it right. Thanks for your work on this. It's really good!

Copy link
Member

@davisagli davisagli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aside from the pending suggestion, this looks good to me.

@mauritsvanrees mauritsvanrees force-pushed the maurits-start-upgrade-guide-plone-62 branch from 20d6ad4 to b6b66bf Compare December 18, 2025 09:50
@mauritsvanrees
Copy link
Member Author

I have rebased on 6.0 and force pushed, because the merge and revert of the multilingual PR which added the same file, gave a conflict.

@petschki
Copy link
Member

I've created a TinyMCE license key config documentation here #2012

we should mention here, that TinyMCE got updated to v8 and that you're able to provide commercial tinymce license keys now.

From PR review by Steve.
@stevepiercy
Copy link
Contributor

I've created a TinyMCE license key config documentation here #2012

we should mention here, that TinyMCE got updated to v8 and that you're able to provide commercial tinymce license keys now.

@petschki would you please amend your PR to do just that? It'd be better to keep the docs for a given feature together in the same PR.

@stevepiercy stevepiercy merged commit a94b398 into 6.0 Dec 19, 2025
3 checks passed
@stevepiercy stevepiercy deleted the maurits-start-upgrade-guide-plone-62 branch December 19, 2025 13:23
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in Plone Documentation Dec 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants