Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @toby-coleman, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request enhances the Tuner's capabilities by introducing a robust mechanism for handling constraints during optimization runs. It defines a dedicated exception for constraint violations and integrates its handling directly into the optimization process, ensuring that trials breaching specified constraints are appropriately penalized and logged. This allows for more controlled and effective optimization by guiding the Tuner away from invalid or undesirable parameter configurations.
Highlights
- New Exception Type: Introduced a new
ConstraintErrorexception class inplugboard/exceptions/__init__.py. This exception is intended to be raised byComponentinstances when a defined constraint is violated during an optimization run. - Tuner Constraint Handling: Modified the
Tuner's internal objective function (_build_objectiveinplugboard/tune/tune.py) to catchConstraintErrorexceptions. When a constraint is violated, a warning is logged, and the objective value for that trial is set tomath.inf(for minimization) or-math.inf(for maximization) to effectively penalize the trial and guide the optimization away from invalid parameter spaces. - Ray Tune Integration for Early Stopping: Configured the underlying
ray.tune.Tunerinstance to stop trials early when aconstraint_hitsignal is received. This integrates the newConstraintErrorhandling with Ray Tune's stopping mechanisms, allowing for more efficient optimization by terminating unpromising trials. - Integration Tests for Constraints: Added a new integration test (
test_tune_with_constraintintests/integration/test_tuner.py) to validate theTuner's behavior with constraints. This test uses a customConstrainedBcomponent that raisesConstraintErrorunder specific conditions, ensuring that theTunercorrectly handles these violations, penalizes the objective, and maintains valid results.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a mechanism to handle constraints in the Tuner. It adds a ConstraintError and updates the optimization objective function to catch this error, assigning a very poor score to trials that violate constraints. This allows the optimizer to avoid invalid regions of the parameter space. I've identified a bug in the multi-objective optimization logic and a disconnected early-stopping configuration. The provided suggestions aim to fix these issues to make the constraint handling more robust and effective.
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
Summary
Closes #149 and allows optimisation runs to apply constraints during a run.
Changes
ConstraintError, which can be raised by aComponentwhen a constraint is breached.