Exclude "content" or "_predefined_fields" from the serialized object #872
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
stonebuzz
requested changes
Dec 12, 2024
Comment on lines
+969
to
+971
| if (item.name === "content" || item.name === "_predefined_fields") { | ||
| return obj; | ||
| } |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
With this,
Fields named content or _predefined_fields are ignored. This means that these fields will not be included in the final object.
However, they can be used in conditions to hide a block.
Without this fields, condition can't be check
Contributor
|
Hello, I am closing this pull request as it has not progressed and, in its current state, it removes a feature (the visibility condition from the ticket description). Best regards, |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
It seems to work properly in my environment but I'm not familiar enough with the code base to know if that the right solution.