Skip to content

Backporting the CI and code modifications into 2.10 for python 3.10 compatibilities#1377

Merged
carlocamilloni merged 4 commits intoplumed:v2.10from
Iximiel:update/backportingpython310
Mar 10, 2026
Merged

Backporting the CI and code modifications into 2.10 for python 3.10 compatibilities#1377
carlocamilloni merged 4 commits intoplumed:v2.10from
Iximiel:update/backportingpython310

Conversation

@Iximiel
Copy link
Member

@Iximiel Iximiel commented Mar 10, 2026

Description

@GiovanniBussi. I backported to 2.10 some modifications (CI, Fedora docker, pycv) in #1372, when this is merged @Luthaf can rebase #1348 on v2.10 and finish the pythorch update.

There will be a few merge conflict with master, I am setting up a manual merge in a next PR

Target release

I would like my code to appear in release 2.10

Type of contribution
  • changes to code or doc authored by PLUMED developers, or additions of code in the core or within the default modules
  • changes to a module not authored by you
  • new module contribution or edit of a module authored by you
Copyright
  • I agree to transfer the copyright of the code I have written to the PLUMED developers or to the author of the code I am modifying.
  • the module I added or modified contains a COPYRIGHT file with the correct license information. Code should be released under an open source license. I also used the command cd src && ./header.sh mymodulename in order to make sure the headers of the module are correct.
Tests
  • I added a new regtest or modified an existing regtest to validate my changes.
  • I verified that all regtests are passed successfully on GitHub Actions.

@carlocamilloni carlocamilloni merged commit 9c165e8 into plumed:v2.10 Mar 10, 2026
15 of 18 checks passed
@Iximiel Iximiel mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2026
7 tasks
@Iximiel Iximiel deleted the update/backportingpython310 branch March 11, 2026 10:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants