Backporting the CI and code modifications into 2.10 for python 3.10 compatibilities#1377
Merged
carlocamilloni merged 4 commits intoplumed:v2.10from Mar 10, 2026
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
@GiovanniBussi. I backported to 2.10 some modifications (CI, Fedora docker, pycv) in #1372, when this is merged @Luthaf can rebase #1348 on v2.10 and finish the pythorch update.
There will be a few merge conflict with master, I am setting up a manual merge in a next PR
Target release
I would like my code to appear in release 2.10
Type of contribution
Copyright
COPYRIGHTfile with the correct license information. Code should be released under an open source license. I also used the commandcd src && ./header.sh mymodulenamein order to make sure the headers of the module are correct.Tests