Skip to content

[RLHF Feedback]: Didn't took any previous context during the implementation #4

@deepak2431

Description

@deepak2431

Feedback

What did the agent do well?

  • Updated the /superadmin routes by making code changes to /app/superadmin/page-content.tsx to add the metrics for the organisation, users and the total submissions.
  • Fixed the organisation map rendering issue by handling the undefined cases of the data.
  • Implemented the API endpoints for fetching each organisation's details with the superadmin role level access in the apps/backend-fastapi/api/routes/organizations.py.

What did the agent do badly?

  • Didn't understand the requirements properly for implementing the superadmin access level data dashboard with each operation of org creation, etc., in a single page, rather than adding all in the "Overview" page.
  • The organisation details page created didn't inherit the dashboard sidebar component for better UI/UX.
  • Didn't update the dashboard flow to render based on the user access level, as stated with different components and data metrics.
  • Jumped directly to the implementation without laying down the plan for the implementation and aligning the requirements correctly, as stated before, during the coding process.

What should the agent have known?

  • The agent should have understood the flow of how the different API data should be passed for the role level as admin, superadmin and the user.
  • The agent should have understood the views of the UI/UX for each role level, as the admin and the superadmin don't need the page to create the container for accessing the code sandbox.
  • The agent should have remembered the previous instructions of planning the tasks and stating the solution to implement for aligning with the requirements before starting off the implementation directly.

As a senior developer, what is the ideal agent’s work behaviour?

  • Analyse the current dashboard UI/UX, which is created just for a user-level view, and come up with a plan on how the same dashboard components can be used to create a view.
  • Writing code for individual tasks, first verify with the task and flow before moving to the next.
  • Understanding the UI/UX design language used for

Session

  • Pool version: v1.0.0
  • OS/arch: darwin/arm64
  • Session ID: 019ddac7-1dd2-70f2-abeb-52ee004ca886
  • Agent server: default
  • Agent command: /Users/deepak/.local/bin/pool
  • Model: poolside/laguna-m.1
  • Timestamp: 2026-04-30T14:15:41+05:30

Logs

Attach this zip before submitting:

/var/folders/4s/8lqwbysn5j5_dnvpw6mb9cdc0000gn/T/pool-logs/20260430-141541-019ddac7-1dd2-70f2-abeb-52ee004ca886/logs.zip

Logs and trajectory contain

logs.zip

full prompt and response text from the session. Review before submitting.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions