Skip to content

Conversation

@hadar-co
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context.

Added docs pages

Please also include the path for the added docs

  • Quickstart (/)
  • Blueprint (/platform-overview/port-components/blueprint)
  • ...

Updated docs pages

Please also include the path for the updated docs

  • Quickstart (/)
  • Blueprint (/platform-overview/port-components/blueprint)
  • ...

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Aug 18, 2025

Claude finished @hadar-co's task —— View job


PR Review: Comment out SCIM

Todo List:

  • Read CONTRIBUTING.md for review guidelines
  • Read CLAUDE.md for repo-specific instructions (file not found)
  • Examine changed files to understand SCIM-related changes
  • Analyze changes for consistency and correctness
  • Provide detailed review feedback in markdown format

Review Summary

This PR comments out SCIM configuration sections across 4 SSO documentation files. The changes are consistent and correctly implemented with only minor suggestions for improvement.

Detailed Review

Positive Aspects

  1. Consistent Implementation: All 4 files have identical change patterns using HTML comment syntax ``
  2. Proper Scope: Only SCIM sections were commented out while preserving all other SSO configuration content
  3. Clean Approach: Using HTML comments preserves the content for potential future restoration
  4. No Breaking Changes: The main SSO setup flows remain intact and functional

⚠️ Areas for Improvement

  1. Missing PR Description: The PR description uses template boilerplate and doesn't explain:

    • Why SCIM sections are being commented out
    • Whether this is temporary or permanent
    • Context about SCIM beta status changes
  2. Documentation Standards: According to CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines:

    • Consider if this content should be completely removed rather than commented out
    • If keeping as comments, consider adding a brief explanation of why it's commented out

📂 Files Affected

File Lines Commented Content
docs/sso-rbac/sso-providers/oidc/azure-ad.md 273-292 SCIM setup guide for Azure AD OIDC
docs/sso-rbac/sso-providers/oidc/okta.md 141-192 SCIM configuration for Okta OIDC
docs/sso-rbac/sso-providers/saml/azure-ad.md 69-86 SCIM setup for Azure AD SAML
docs/sso-rbac/sso-providers/saml/okta.md 85-114 SCIM configuration for Okta SAML

🔍 Technical Review

  • HTML Comment Syntax: ✅ Correctly implemented across all files
  • Content Preservation: ✅ All SCIM content is preserved within comments
  • Link Integrity: ✅ No broken links since commented sections are self-contained
  • Formatting: ✅ Maintains proper markdown structure
  • Imports: ✅ SCIM-related imports (ScimFunctionality, ScimLimitation) are preserved but unused

💡 Recommendations

  1. Update PR Description: Add context about why SCIM is being commented out
  2. Consider Cleanup: If this is permanent, consider removing unused imports like ScimFunctionality and ScimLimitation
  3. Future Documentation: If SCIM will return, consider adding a brief note in the visible documentation about SCIM availability status

Approval Status

APPROVED - The changes are technically sound and consistent. While the PR description could be improved, the actual code changes are well-executed and maintain documentation quality standards.


@aws-amplify-eu-west-1
Copy link

This pull request is automatically being deployed by Amplify Hosting (learn more).

Access this pull request here: https://pr-2689.d2ngvl90zqbob8.amplifyapp.com

@hadar-co hadar-co merged commit 5cd89b9 into main Aug 18, 2025
4 checks passed
@hadar-co hadar-co deleted the rbac-hide branch August 18, 2025 07:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants