Prepare release, optimize executeBatch on the web#138
Merged
Conversation
rkistner
approved these changes
Apr 13, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This updates the
sqlite3_webpackage to its latest version0.7.0. A breaking change in that version is that custom requests sent to database workers are now represented as aCustomClientRequestandCustomClientDatabaseRequest. This supports:This replaces the old
executeBatchInTransactionrequest (which isn't actually used) with a genericexecuteBatchrequest that works in transactions and can take locks into account. That allows using a single request in the client instead of one per parameter set.This also marks the version as 0.14.0. We've released a pre-release last week, a few users have tested it and we didn't hear about any regressions.