Skip to content

Conversation

@nikolasburk
Copy link
Contributor

@nikolasburk nikolasburk commented Sep 15, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated Prisma ORM setup guide for environments without Rust engines to use the “prisma-client” generator in examples, with an inline note about the “prisma-client-js” alternative.
    • Clarifies recommended configuration and aligns examples with current guidance, reducing confusion for setup and ensuring readers follow the appropriate generator for Rust-free usage.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 15, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The MDX documentation for Prisma ORM no-Rust-engine setup updates the generator example: the provider is changed from "prisma-client-js" to "prisma-client", and the inline comment is updated to reference the alternative. Other fields (output, engineType) remain unchanged.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change summary
Docs: Prisma generator provider update
content/200-orm/200-prisma-client/000-setup-and-configuration/300-no-rust-engine.mdx
In the generator block example, switch provider from "prisma-client-js" to "prisma-client" and adjust the inline comment to "// or prisma-client-js". No other edits.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • mhessdev
  • ankur-arch
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch nikolasburk-patch-6

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 834e223 and a79f610.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • content/200-orm/200-prisma-client/000-setup-and-configuration/300-no-rust-engine.mdx (1 hunks)

Tip

👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!

Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.

  • Built-in checks – Quickly apply ready-made checks to enforce title conventions, require pull request descriptions that follow templates, validate linked issues for compliance, and more.
  • Custom agentic checks – Define your own rules using CodeRabbit’s advanced agentic capabilities to enforce organization-specific policies and workflows. For example, you can instruct CodeRabbit’s agent to verify that API documentation is updated whenever API schema files are modified in a PR. Note: Upto 5 custom checks are currently allowed during the preview period. Pricing for this feature will be announced in a few weeks.

Please see the documentation for more information.

Example:

reviews:
  pre_merge_checks:
    custom_checks:
      - name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
        mode: "warning"
        instructions: |
          Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).

Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Dangerous URL check

No absolute URLs to prisma.io/docs found.
No local URLs found.

@nikolasburk nikolasburk merged commit 04a0882 into main Sep 15, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Redirect check

This PR probably requires the following redirects to be added to static/_redirects:

  • This PR does not change any pages in a way that would require a redirect.

@nikolasburk nikolasburk deleted the nikolasburk-patch-6 branch September 15, 2025 08:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants