Skip to content

feat: add new blog on Prisma Next#7831

Merged
ankur-arch merged 1 commit intomainfrom
DR-8150
Apr 27, 2026
Merged

feat: add new blog on Prisma Next#7831
ankur-arch merged 1 commit intomainfrom
DR-8150

Conversation

@ankur-arch
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ankur-arch ankur-arch commented Apr 27, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • New blog article on TypeScript migrations in Prisma Next, covering migration workflows, verification mechanisms, practical SQL vs TypeScript comparisons, failure handling, and agent-assisted workflow support.

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel Bot commented Apr 27, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
blog Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 27, 2026 0:54am
docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 27, 2026 0:54am
eclipse Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 27, 2026 0:54am
site Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 27, 2026 0:54am

Request Review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 27, 2026

Walkthrough

A new blog article is added documenting Prisma Next migrations as TypeScript-defined operations. The post covers migration workflows, JSON operation structures, verification mechanisms, failure reporting, re-execution safety, contract verification, and raw SQL options. It includes CLI examples and guidance on handling migration failures and agent-assisted workflows.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
New Blog Article
apps/blog/content/blog/typescript-migrations-in-prisma-next/index.mdx
New 299-line documentation article explaining Prisma Next TypeScript migrations, including operation structure, planner/apply workflow, verification strategies, failure handling, and practical setup guidance.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'feat: add new blog on Prisma Next' accurately describes the main change: adding a new blog article about Prisma Next migrations.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/blog/content/blog/typescript-migrations-in-prisma-next/index.mdx (1)

281-281: Tighten wording for concision.

Consider replacing “a lot of mistakes” with “many mistakes” for a cleaner sentence.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@apps/blog/content/blog/typescript-migrations-in-prisma-next/index.mdx` at
line 281, Replace the phrase "a lot of mistakes" with "many mistakes" in the
sentence currently reading "You can let an agent write a migration in Prisma
Next with confidence that the system will catch a lot of mistakes." Update that
exact sentence (the paragraph about agents writing migrations and getting
feedback on failed operations and checks) to use "many mistakes" for tighter,
more concise wording.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@apps/blog/content/blog/typescript-migrations-in-prisma-next/index.mdx`:
- Around line 179-186: The examples show inconsistent CLI launchers: change all
occurrences so they use a single launcher (either "npx" or "pnpx") for
consistency; update the lines containing the examples like "npx prisma-next
migration plan", "npx prisma-next migration apply --verbose" and the later
example that currently uses "pnpx" so they all match the chosen launcher (or add
a brief note explaining when to use "pnpx" vs "npx" if you intentionally want
both).

---

Nitpick comments:
In `@apps/blog/content/blog/typescript-migrations-in-prisma-next/index.mdx`:
- Line 281: Replace the phrase "a lot of mistakes" with "many mistakes" in the
sentence currently reading "You can let an agent write a migration in Prisma
Next with confidence that the system will catch a lot of mistakes." Update that
exact sentence (the paragraph about agents writing migrations and getting
feedback on failed operations and checks) to use "many mistakes" for tighter,
more concise wording.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 13831bff-1eb0-4e99-ba39-c2e7a8bd901f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7b3a7af and 95a1bc1.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • apps/blog/public/typescript-migrations-in-prisma-next/imgs/typescript-migrations-in-prisma-next.png is excluded by !**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/blog/content/blog/typescript-migrations-in-prisma-next/index.mdx

@argos-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

argos-ci Bot commented Apr 27, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Argos notifications ↗︎

Build Status Details Updated (UTC)
default (Inspect) ✅ No changes detected - Apr 27, 2026, 1:11 PM

@ankur-arch ankur-arch self-assigned this Apr 27, 2026
@ankur-arch ankur-arch merged commit f15b443 into main Apr 27, 2026
17 of 18 checks passed
@ankur-arch ankur-arch deleted the DR-8150 branch April 27, 2026 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants