add script to pull in latest p5 version#364
Merged
limzykenneth merged 1 commit intomainfrom May 23, 2024
Merged
Conversation
and use across website pages
limzykenneth
approved these changes
May 23, 2024
Collaborator
|
While I'm checking the reference page, I noticed that some of the reference are not showing the updates from the latest 1.9.4 release. For example, draw() in the old p5.js website is updated last month, but draw() in the new website is updated three months ago. Can we double check if the new reference from the 1.9.4 release are properly built in the new website? @outofambit @davepagurek @limzykenneth @ccanash |
Member
|
We need to manually run the script to update the reference before committing and pushing it. I'll make that part of the release action after we have launched fully. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
and use across website pages
re: #359 (comment)