On the Processing.org website (example), I have to take exception on the use of Colophon's "Space Mono" for code. Code doesn't parse like regular text. The absence of any hook on the minuscule "j" in the style used makes it read like an "i". "i" and "j" are the most common names for iterating-variables for nested loops, and that's been the case since your grandfathers' time ("i" stood for "integer" or maybe "iterate" and then you'd use i, j, k, etc.). I can't for the life of me imagine why the CSS selects OpenType stylistic set "ss02", which features that truncated "j". Perhaps even more troubling is that the comma and period are very difficult to distinguish at the default size (14px), and naturally that's a fatal problem for reading code. Please find a suitable solution. This issue costs me and my students time basically every day. Removing "ss02" only resolves the "j" problem, but you're still left with the comma/period conundrum (I'm not sure what the use of "ss04" and "ss05" have in store for the user, but it's also worth investigating).
So, you may want to choose a different font or let Colophon help you revise the font or find some other solution. If you want me to be involved in figuring out an appropriate solution, let me know. I've already sent basically the same report to Design Systems International, since they appear to have been involved at one point, but I don't know who makes font decisions now.
https://processing.org/examples/graphing2dequation.html
On the Processing.org website (example), I have to take exception on the use of Colophon's "Space Mono" for code. Code doesn't parse like regular text. The absence of any hook on the minuscule "j" in the style used makes it read like an "i". "i" and "j" are the most common names for iterating-variables for nested loops, and that's been the case since your grandfathers' time ("i" stood for "integer" or maybe "iterate" and then you'd use i, j, k, etc.). I can't for the life of me imagine why the CSS selects OpenType stylistic set "ss02", which features that truncated "j". Perhaps even more troubling is that the comma and period are very difficult to distinguish at the default size (14px), and naturally that's a fatal problem for reading code. Please find a suitable solution. This issue costs me and my students time basically every day. Removing "ss02" only resolves the "j" problem, but you're still left with the comma/period conundrum (I'm not sure what the use of "ss04" and "ss05" have in store for the user, but it's also worth investigating).
So, you may want to choose a different font or let Colophon help you revise the font or find some other solution. If you want me to be involved in figuring out an appropriate solution, let me know. I've already sent basically the same report to Design Systems International, since they appear to have been involved at one point, but I don't know who makes font decisions now.
https://processing.org/examples/graphing2dequation.html