Skip to content

Conversation

@smoser
Copy link
Contributor

@smoser smoser commented Nov 13, 2023

Some tests were using

type: docker
url: docker://ubuntu:latest

Rather than using:

type: oci
url: oci:${UBUNTU_OCI}

Replacing those with the oci reference drops a test runtime dependency we have on docker hub.

I've left the 'type' of docker in place to test a code path that uses 'type: docker' to refer to 'oci:'.

What type of PR is this?

Which issue does this PR fix:

What does this PR do / Why do we need it:

If an issue # is not available please add repro steps and logs showing the issue:

Testing done on this change:

Automation added to e2e:

Will this break upgrades or downgrades?

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?:


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Some tests were using

   type: docker
   url: docker://ubuntu:latest

Rather than using:

   type: oci
   url: oci:${UBUNTU_OCI}

Replacing those with the oci reference drops a test runtime
dependency we have on docker hub.

I've left the 'type' of docker in place to test a code path
that uses 'type: docker' to refer to 'oci:'.

Signed-off-by: Scott Moser <smoser@brickies.net>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (c75830e) 13.01% compared to head (b0c5745) 13.01%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #547   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   13.01%   13.01%           
=======================================
  Files          40       40           
  Lines        6003     6003           
=======================================
  Hits          781      781           
  Misses       5094     5094           
  Partials      128      128           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@rchincha rchincha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@rchincha rchincha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@smoser smoser merged commit 6899344 into project-stacker:main Nov 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants