chore: update codeowners and add pull request template

[inffy]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated repository configuration to clarify code ownership and directory structure for contributors.
  • Enhanced pull request template with guidance on proper file placement and contribution workflow.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@inffy, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 7 minutes and 1 second. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 39cdbdfd-7d73-49da-bac1-d791d7158d9c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f86a80a and 3a2aa74.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .github/CODEOWNERS
• .github/pull_request_template.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR establishes repository governance by defining code ownership for system file paths and providing contributor guidance. A CODEOWNERS file maps maintainers to shared and Bluefin-specific directories. A new pull request template directs contributors to place Bluefin/Gnome changes in system_files/bluefin/ and global changes in system_files/shared/.

Changes

Repository governance and contributor guidelines

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Repository governance and contributor guidelines .github/CODEOWNERS, .github/pull_request_template.md	CODEOWNERS assigns three maintainers to system_files/shared/* and two maintainers to system_files/bluefin/*. Pull request template welcomes contributors, directs them to read the README, and instructs placement of Bluefin/Gnome changes in system_files/bluefin/ and global changes in system_files/shared/.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

A rabbit hops through governance bright,
With owners named and paths set right,
Bluefin here, shared over there,
Contributors guided with utmost care! 🐰

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main changes: updating CODEOWNERS file and adding a pull request template.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In @.github/CODEOWNERS:
- Line 2: The CODEOWNERS entry uses a non-recursive glob
("system_files/shared/*") so nested files escape ownership; update the pattern
to a recursive glob ("system_files/shared/**") to ensure ownership applies to
all nested files and replicate the same change for the other similar entries
referenced (the "5-5" occurrence) so review enforcement covers entire directory
trees.

In @.github/pull_request_template.md:
- Line 3: Update the pull request template text to fix contributor-facing typos
and phrasing: change "directery" to "directory", change "go the" to "go to the",
and normalize "Gnome related" to "GNOME-related"; apply these corrections in the
sentence that references the README link and in the duplicate occurrence noted
(also applies to the other instance). Ensure the corrected sentence reads
clearly (e.g., "Please read the README and ensure your change goes to the
correct directory.") and keep the README link intact.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 20c6d914-7c1c-4c95-b6c5-53cf5c99bc06

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between af30c2c and f86a80a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .github/CODEOWNERS
• .github/pull_request_template.md

[inffy]

No idea who else should be there, so i think they can add themselves if needed. atleast the core people are there now