Skip to content

Conversation

@linclaus
Copy link

  • add UUID attribute to each alert, so that we can locate them

simonpasquier and others added 6 commits July 28, 2020 22:03
Signed-off-by: Simon Pasquier <spasquie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: linclaus <linclaus@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Pasquier <spasquie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: linclaus <linclaus@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Pasquier <spasquie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: linclaus <linclaus@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: linclaus <linclaus@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: linclaus <linclaus@outlook.com>
@roidelapluie
Copy link
Member

That would not work in a HA setup.

@linclaus
Copy link
Author

linclaus commented Aug 9, 2020

That would not work in a HA setup.

Can you outline the reasons?

@simonpasquier
Copy link
Member

Because when you have mulitple Alertmanager instances, each of them will generate a different UUID value while the alerts are the same. I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish here.

@roidelapluie
Copy link
Member

And I think that alerts also offer a fingerprint now.

@brian-brazil
Copy link
Contributor

Alerts are already uniquely identified by their labels.

@linclaus
Copy link
Author

And I think that alerts also offer a fingerprint now.

Fingerprint can only distinguish between alerts with different labels, but what if I want to distinguish each alert that has been sent?

@linclaus
Copy link
Author

Because when you have mulitple Alertmanager instances, each of them will generate a different UUID value while the alerts are the same. I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish here.

So we will receive multiple alerts from one Alertmanager route when there have multiple Alertmanager instances? From the recipient's point of view, I want to record and trace all the alerts I received.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Oct 18, 2020
@SuperQ
Copy link
Member

SuperQ commented Oct 31, 2025

Hello from the Alertmanager bug scrub. This change is stale so it will be closed. If you would like to continue this work, please open a new pull request.

@SuperQ SuperQ closed this Oct 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants