Skip to content

Conversation

@Sinjo
Copy link
Member

@Sinjo Sinjo commented Dec 27, 2023

We've had to switch to the main JRuby Docker image as CircleCI have stopped publishing their own CI-optimised ones with extra tools installed. It turns out this isn't a problem for us as we're not dependent on much in the image.

See: https://discuss.circleci.com/t/legacy-convenience-image-deprecation/41034

This commit also switches versions 9.2 and 9.3 to the main JRuby Docker image, but not 9.1 as that breaks for some inscrutable reason. We'll drop 9.1 and all other unsupported Rubies in our next major release.

@Sinjo Sinjo force-pushed the sinjo-add-jruby-9.4 branch 2 times, most recently from 60cd07e to 6d7840b Compare January 5, 2024 10:28
We've had to switch to the main JRuby Docker image as CircleCI have
stopped publishing their own CI-optimised ones with extra tools
installed. It turns out this isn't a problem for us as we're not
dependent on much in the image.

See: https://discuss.circleci.com/t/legacy-convenience-image-deprecation/41034

This commit also switches versions 9.2 and 9.3 to the main JRuby Docker
image, but not 9.1 as that breaks for some inscrutable reason. We'll
drop 9.1 and all other unsupported Rubies in our next major release.

Signed-off-by: Chris Sinjakli <chris@sinjakli.co.uk>
@Sinjo Sinjo force-pushed the sinjo-add-jruby-9.4 branch from 6d7840b to 566fa0d Compare January 5, 2024 10:29
@Sinjo Sinjo merged commit 8b177b4 into main Jan 5, 2024
@Sinjo Sinjo deleted the sinjo-add-jruby-9.4 branch January 5, 2024 10:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants