Skip to content

Conversation

@prombot
Copy link
Contributor

@prombot prombot commented Feb 12, 2025

No description provided.

@dongjiang1989
Copy link

/mark

@dongjiang1989
Copy link

/cc @simonpasquier
prometheus-operator/prometheus-operator#7338 depend on this PR

@SuperQ SuperQ marked this pull request as draft February 20, 2025 20:06
@SuperQ
Copy link
Member

SuperQ commented Feb 20, 2025

We should hold off on this for a few weeks now that we have just released Prometheus 3.2.0 and #296 is not yet merged.

Once we're reasonably sure we don't need a patch release, we can bump the tools and builder before Prometheus 3.3.0.

@machine424
Copy link
Member

I'd like to use 1.24 for Prometheus 3.3 as well prometheus/prometheus#16171
Given that the images are tagged, I don't see why we should block this after each release, maybe I'm missing sth.

@SuperQ
Copy link
Member

SuperQ commented Mar 5, 2025

@machine424 I think we needed #296 merged first, which changes a bunch of the underlying tools.

@SuperQ SuperQ marked this pull request as ready for review March 5, 2025 14:47
Signed-off-by: prombot <prometheus-team@googlegroups.com>
@SuperQ SuperQ merged commit 8cc6756 into master Mar 5, 2025
5 checks passed
@SuperQ SuperQ deleted the bump_version branch March 5, 2025 16:15
@SuperQ SuperQ restored the bump_version branch March 8, 2025 08:06
@prombot prombot deleted the bump_version branch April 2, 2025 12:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants