Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
|
That's an excellent idea, thanks. |
0 replies
|
My biggest concern about this is that I primarily work on a Mac, and my understanding is that Docker for Mac continues to suffer from performance issues, especially around database handling. Because Porter is database-intensive, my concern is I'm going to get this all setup and it'll be mostly useless for Mac-based engineers doing large migrations due to that. Running Porter on an M1 natively is incredibly fast and I'd hate to lose that gain. |
1 reply
|
The next release will include Docker support. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
A Docker image is a great way to package an application like Nitro Porter, enabling someone to just download the Docker image and run a container (be it for the web or for the CLI).
All reactions