-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
feat: 添加 buf format #17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @kooksee, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces a new format command to the protobuild CLI, leveraging the buf tool to automatically format Protobuf files. This enhancement aims to improve code consistency and developer experience. Additionally, the PR includes a comprehensive update of Go module dependencies and applies consistent formatting across existing Protobuf definition files.
Highlights
- New
protobuild formatcommand: A newformatcommand has been added to theprotobuildCLI. This command integrates with thebuftool to automatically format Protobuf files by executingbuf format proto -w. - Dependency Updates: Numerous Go module dependencies have been updated to their latest versions, ensuring the project uses up-to-date libraries and potentially benefiting from bug fixes and performance improvements.
- Protobuf File Reformatting: Existing
.protofiles across the repository have been reformatted for consistency. This includes changes to import order, option declarations, and general spacing, likely as a result of applyingbuf formator similar tooling. - Documentation and Example Updates: The
README.mdhas been updated to include instructions for using the newformatcommand, as well as the existinglintcommand. A newprotobuf.test.yamlexample configuration for the linter has also been added.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a format command that utilizes buf format to standardize protobuf file formatting. It also includes updates to dependencies and documentation. The implementation is straightforward, but I've identified a few areas for improvement concerning logging practices, command execution safety, and adherence to Protobuf style conventions. These suggestions aim to enhance the code's robustness and maintainability.
|
|
||
| ## format | ||
|
|
||
| protobuild format -c protobuf.test.yaml |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| Action: func(ctx context.Context, command *cli.Command) error { | ||
| bufPath, err := exec.LookPath("buf") | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| slog.Info("buf not found, please install https://github.com/bufbuild/buf/releases") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When buf is not found, it's an error condition. Using slog.Error instead of slog.Info would better reflect the severity of the situation and improve log-based monitoring and filtering.
| slog.Info("buf not found, please install https://github.com/bufbuild/buf/releases") | |
| slog.Error("buf not found, please install https://github.com/bufbuild/buf/releases") |
| return err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| shutil.MustRun(bufPath, "format proto -w") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's safer to pass command arguments as separate strings rather than a single string. This prevents potential shell injection vulnerabilities and handles arguments with spaces correctly, even though bufPath is unlikely to have spaces here.
| shutil.MustRun(bufPath, "format proto -w") | |
| shutil.MustRun(bufPath, "format", "proto", "-w") |
| import "google/protobuf/timestamp.proto"; | ||
| import "retag/retag.proto"; | ||
|
|
||
| option go_package = "github.com/pubgo/protobuild/pkg/orm;ormpb"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
|
||
| import "google/protobuf/timestamp.proto"; | ||
| import "google/protobuf/descriptor.proto"; | ||
| import "google/protobuf/timestamp.proto"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| import "retag/retag.proto"; | ||
| import "orm/gorm.proto"; | ||
|
|
||
| option go_package = "github.com/pubgo/protobuild/pkg/orm;ormpb"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No description provided.