-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 143
Fix gunicorn "Control server error" on kubernetes #7591
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
pedro-psb
wants to merge
1
commit into
pulp:main
Choose a base branch
from
pedro-psb:fix/gunicorn-control-socket-path
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+5
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | ||
| Fixed gunicorn control socket being placed on persistent location. | ||
| This could cause `Control server error: [Errno 13]` errors on kubernetes environements on pod restarts. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What was the default location?
This file belongs in /run/ somewhere.
https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/ch03s15.html
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It defaults to the current directory: https://gunicorn.org/guides/gunicornc/#start-gunicorn-with-control-socket
I wonder why.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmmm, the code apparently says something else:
https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/blob/9aa54703f4950818aed538dbee9578e868375cc9/gunicorn/config.py#L3138-L3146
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, it was changed in 25.2: benoitc/gunicorn@0ad47db
I guess we should not do anything, then.
This change was to improve on gunicorn's default (of version 25.1), but they have improved by themselves.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or do you think it's still worth it, to account for the case 25.1 is installed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So what I understand is that gunicorn tries XDG_RUNTIME_DIR first and falls back to HOME.
I would claim that the variable XDG_RUNTIME_DIR should have been set. Not sure if the os in the container or the container runtime is to blame, but the default gunicorn behaviour seems sound to me and your change makes that unnecessarily rigid.
We should probably propagate the option instead so it stays possible to overwrite it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That sounds good.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The first release of the feature the default was the current directory (whathever that was...). In the following Y they've changed to this, which I agree is sane.