content(overdoing): name witness as the cell-filler + add 11th matrix column#40
Merged
content(overdoing): name witness as the cell-filler + add 11th matrix column#40
Conversation
… column Per advisor's recommendation: ship this post with witness named in it before doing anything else on either the post or the tool. The post is the carrier wave; witness is what people click through to once they understand why the cell was empty. Three concrete changes: - Add gloss bullet for "Structural coverage (Wasm IR)" naming witness with a link to github.com/pulseengine/witness, framed as the cell-filler for the §FM.6.7(f) / MC/DC-shaped slot that source-level lcov has long pretended to satisfy across DO-178C, ISO 26262, IEC 61508 - Add 11th column "Struct. coverage" to the credit matrix (between Mutation testing and Trace-ability) - Fill the column: strong dot for DO-178C, ISO 26262, IEC 61508; the other four standards (EN 50128, IEC 62304, ECSS-Q-ST-80C, IEC 60880) have deliberately-empty fit-na cells with title="not yet mapped — credit-template work is the next post's hook" The empty cells are intentional — they mark the credit-template gap honestly and give the next post a hook. Tooltips on hover clarify the "not yet mapped" framing vs. the existing "standard silent" use of fit-na (which the legend still describes; the overload is small enough to leave alone for now). Date and draft flag unchanged: still scheduled for auto-publish on 2026-04-29. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Per advisor's recommendation: ship the Overdoing the verification chain post this week with witness named in it, before doing anything else on either the post or the tool. The post is the carrier wave; witness is what people click through to once they understand why the cell was empty.
The post stays scheduled for auto-publish on 2026-04-29 (Wednesday) — this PR just lands the content edit before the cron fires.
Three concrete changes
Why deliberately-empty rather than `fit-gap` or `fit-partial`
Per advisor: "that's honest and it's the next post's hook." An empty cell signals different uncertainty than `fit-gap` (which means "we don't have the technique"). Here we have the technique; we just haven't done the credit-template mapping for those four standards yet.
Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code