Skip to content

chore(release): bump vscode-rivet/package.json to 0.4.3#201

Merged
avrabe merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/v043-vscode-bump
Apr 23, 2026
Merged

chore(release): bump vscode-rivet/package.json to 0.4.3#201
avrabe merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/v043-vscode-bump

Conversation

@avrabe
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@avrabe avrabe commented Apr 23, 2026

Summary

Missed in the v0.4.3 release bump (#200). Docs-check `VersionConsistency` invariant fails CI on the v0.4.3 tag because the VS Code extension package stayed at 0.4.2 while workspace moved to 0.4.3.

Platform packages stay at 0.4.1 intentionally — `release-npm.yml` overwrites them at publish time via jq.

Next step after merge

The v0.4.3 tag already points at the previous commit (which lacks this fix). Suggested recovery: after merge, move the v0.4.3 tag to the new main HEAD so the Release workflow re-runs against the fixed tree.

Test plan

  • `rivet docs check` passes locally (0 violations)

Trace: skip

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Missed in the v0.4.3 release bump (#200). Docs-check VersionConsistency
invariant fails CI on the v0.4.3 tag because the VS Code extension
package stayed at 0.4.2 while workspace moved to 0.4.3.

Platform packages stay at 0.4.1 intentionally — release-npm.yml
overwrites them at publish time via jq.

Trace: skip
@avrabe avrabe merged commit f25e592 into main Apr 23, 2026
1 check passed
@avrabe avrabe deleted the chore/v043-vscode-bump branch April 23, 2026 06:18
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark 'Rivet Criterion Benchmarks'.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.20.

Benchmark suite Current: 1fdaa19 Previous: f25e592 Ratio
store_insert/10000 14120664 ns/iter (± 718153) 11035172 ns/iter (± 606594) 1.28

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant