Skip to content

docs(roadmap): file REQ-093..101 + 10-persona review design doc (supersedes #326)#341

Merged
avrabe merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/roadmap-reqs-093-101-rebuild
May 30, 2026
Merged

docs(roadmap): file REQ-093..101 + 10-persona review design doc (supersedes #326)#341
avrabe merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/roadmap-reqs-093-101-rebuild

Conversation

@avrabe
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@avrabe avrabe commented May 30, 2026

Summary

Clean rebuild of #326, which had gone stale: branched before v0.13.1/2/3, so merging it as-is would have reverted tools/intro-video/ and the version bumps. This re-applies only its content on top of current main.

Closes a real traceability gap: REQ-100 (externals: kind: source) and REQ-101 (rivet verify gate) were referenced as "filed" by later v0.13.x work, but only ever lived in the unmerged #326 branch — they were never on main.

Content

  • docs/design/10-persona-review-roadmap.md — the 10-persona review synthesis (kept as a held roadmap note per direction).
  • REQ-093..099 — v0.14.0+ roadmap REQs: implement FUTURE oracles, rivet release-verify, cargo-build-invokes-validate, SACM 2.x schema, DO-330 typed schema, independence-of-verification-layers oracle, rivet_apply MCP tool.
  • REQ-100externals: kind: source (track non-rivet upstreams without the missing-rivet.yaml warning).
  • REQ-101rivet verify artifact-driven gate (meld pattern).

Verification

  • Inserted in numeric order (092 → 093..101 → 102); no duplicate IDs.
  • rivet validate — PASS
  • rivet docs check — PASS

Action

Merge this; close #326 (superseded).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Clean rebuild of the stale #326 branch (which predated v0.13.1/2/3 and
would have reverted tools/intro-video + version bumps if merged as-is).
Re-applies just its content on top of current main:

- docs/design/10-persona-review-roadmap.md — the 10-persona review
  synthesis (universal-LIKE/DISLIKE matrices, Carrasco hybrid
  flip-conditions, persona→REQ mapping). Kept as a held roadmap note
  per direction.
- REQ-093..099 — the v0.14.0+ roadmap REQs out of that review
  (FUTURE oracles, release-verify, cargo-build-invokes-validate,
  SACM 2.x, DO-330 typed schema, independence oracle, rivet_apply MCP).
- REQ-100 — externals: kind: source (track non-rivet upstreams without
  the missing-rivet.yaml warning).
- REQ-101 — rivet verify artifact-driven gate (meld pattern).

Closes a real traceability gap: REQ-100 / REQ-101 were referenced as
"filed" by later v0.13.x work but only ever lived in the unmerged
#326 branch. Inserted in numeric order (092 → 093..101 → 102); no
duplicate IDs; rivet validate + docs check PASS.

Supersedes #326.
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

📐 Rivet artifact delta

Change Count
Added 9
Removed 0
Modified 0
Downstream impacted (depth ≤ 5) 0

Graph

graph LR
  REQ_093["REQ-093"]:::added
  REQ_094["REQ-094"]:::added
  REQ_095["REQ-095"]:::added
  REQ_096["REQ-096"]:::added
  REQ_097["REQ-097"]:::added
  REQ_098["REQ-098"]:::added
  REQ_099["REQ-099"]:::added
  REQ_100["REQ-100"]:::added
  REQ_101["REQ-101"]:::added
  classDef added fill:#d4edda,stroke:#28a745,color:#155724
  classDef removed fill:#f8d7da,stroke:#dc3545,color:#721c24
  classDef modified fill:#fff3cd,stroke:#ffc107,color:#856404
  classDef overflow fill:#e2e3e5,stroke:#6c757d,color:#495057,stroke-dasharray: 3 3
Loading
Added
  • REQ-093
  • REQ-094
  • REQ-095
  • REQ-096
  • REQ-097
  • REQ-098
  • REQ-099
  • REQ-100
  • REQ-101

📎 Full HTML dashboard attached as workflow artifact rivet-delta-pr-341download from the workflow run.

Posted by rivet-delta workflow. The graph shows only changed artifacts; open the HTML dashboard (above) for full context.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 30, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@avrabe avrabe merged commit 1a83f4a into main May 30, 2026
21 of 39 checks passed
@avrabe avrabe deleted the docs/roadmap-reqs-093-101-rebuild branch May 30, 2026 05:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant