Skip to content

feat(lsp): real handlers + coverage tests#60

Merged
avrabe merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/lsp-handlers-coverage
Mar 21, 2026
Merged

feat(lsp): real handlers + coverage tests#60
avrabe merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/lsp-handlers-coverage

Conversation

@avrabe
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@avrabe avrabe commented Mar 21, 2026

LSP functional: diagnostics, hover, goto-def, completion. 27 new coverage tests.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

LSP is now functional with 4 handlers:
- Diagnostics: publishes validation results mapped to source file + line
- Hover: artifact title, type, description, status, links on hover
- Go-to-definition: ctrl+click artifact ID → source YAML definition
- Completion: artifact IDs on target: lines, types on type: lines

Coverage fixes (27 new tests):
- store.rs: scoped(), upsert, insert edge cases
- schema.rs: Cow<str> field access, regex caching, condition matching
- model.rs: baseline(), BaselineConfig deserialization

Implements: FEAT-047
Satisfies: REQ-029

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@avrabe avrabe merged commit 4d156a2 into main Mar 21, 2026
@avrabe avrabe deleted the feat/lsp-handlers-coverage branch March 21, 2026 16:00
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark 'Rivet Criterion Benchmarks'.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.20.

Benchmark suite Current: 9704c46 Previous: f8cf361 Ratio
link_graph_build/10000 31307502 ns/iter (± 1616287) 23919737 ns/iter (± 776923) 1.31

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Mar 21, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant