docs: agent-fleet wave-1 synthesis (quickstart + 35-bug prioritized list)#35
Merged
docs: agent-fleet wave-1 synthesis (quickstart + 35-bug prioritized list)#35
Conversation
Output of a 14-agent parallel review of Temper. Each agent had a distinct
persona (junior dev, safety-critical architect, QA, security, DevOps, docs
reviewer, performance, day-2 ops, Probot/Octokit expert, supply-chain, LLM
prompt engineer, rivet integration, test quality, senior reviewer) and a
non-overlapping scope.
13 of 14 reported successfully. Aggregated into two artifacts:
## docs/agent-fleet/quickstart.md
Hand-off doc for future agents: what Temper is, what's verified working
(don't redesign), what's confirmed broken, what's deliberately deferred,
and how to pick up a fix without repeating wave-1's investigation.
## docs/agent-fleet/bugs.md
Prioritized list of 35 findings, severity-tagged (5 critical, 10 high,
15 medium, 5 low). Each carries a file:line citation and at least one
wave-1 agent flag. Ends with action priorities ("if only one PR this
week", "if a sprint").
## Why these matter
Wave-1 surfaced bugs that 9 months of iterative dev hadn't:
- `synchronizeIssueLabels` silently deletes user-created labels on every
webhook. Destructive across the org.
- `WEBHOOK_SECRET` defaults to literal "development" when env unset.
Trust boundary fail-open.
- Dashboard POST routes are unauthenticated.
- Test mock retrofit fakes the broken `octokit.issues.X` namespace —
exactly why PRs #22, #29, #34 each had to fix it again at a new call site.
- `success: true` returned when configuration silently degraded.
- `/health` always returns 200.
The cross-cutting theme: "looks like it ran" failure pattern across
ruleset fallback, signed-signatures swallow, scheduler tick errors, and
review-save IO. Fix by class, not case-by-case.
## Not in this commit
Wave-2 work — picking up specific fixes, multi-lens AI review, GitHub
Check Run integration, splitting `src/app.js`. Documented as open
questions in `quickstart.md`.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
14 specialist agents (junior dev, safety-critical architect, QA, security, DevOps, docs, performance, day-2 ops, Probot/Octokit expert, supply-chain, LLM prompt engineer, rivet, test-quality, senior reviewer) ran a non-overlapping parallel review of Temper. 13 reported successfully; aggregated here.
Files
Top critical findings (independently flagged by multiple agents)
Cross-cutting theme: "looks like it ran" failure pattern. Fix by class, not case-by-case.
What's deferred to wave-2 (open questions)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code