Skip to content

(PUP-3328) tidy should follow symlinks#4084

Closed
clehene wants to merge 1 commit intopuppetlabs:masterfrom
clehene:PUP-3328
Closed

(PUP-3328) tidy should follow symlinks#4084
clehene wants to merge 1 commit intopuppetlabs:masterfrom
clehene:PUP-3328

Conversation

@clehene
Copy link

@clehene clehene commented Jul 13, 2015

No description provided.

@puppetcla
Copy link

Waiting for CLA signature by @clehene

@clehene - We require a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) for people who contribute to Puppet, but we have an easy click-through license with instructions, which is available at https://cla.puppetlabs.com/

Note: if your contribution is trivial and you think it may be exempt from the CLA, please post a short reply to this comment with details. http://docs.puppetlabs.com/community/trivial_patch_exemption.html

@puppetcla
Copy link

CLA signed by all contributors.

@HAIL9000
Copy link
Contributor

@MikaelSmith is going to look into this

@kylog
Copy link

kylog commented Aug 3, 2015

First off, thanks for the contribution and kudos for providing an acceptance test!

Next, a few thoughts/questions?

  • it makes me a bit uneasy for this to be the default - e.g. this might be a breaking change for some (unknowingly even)
  • should this be an attribute on tidy?
  • last, specs are failing - can you take a look?

@clehene thoughts on the above?

@kylog
Copy link

kylog commented Aug 17, 2015

@clehene have you had a chance to take a look at the questions/comments above?

@branan
Copy link
Contributor

branan commented Aug 18, 2015

I'm +1 with what kylo wrote. Having this follow symlinks by default makes me incredible nervous, and dropping that bomb onto users is a breaking change. I'd be very happy to see a follow_symlinks parameter on the tidy type.

@clehene
Copy link
Author

clehene commented Aug 18, 2015

Unfortunately no, and I'm not sure when / if I will.

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Kylo Ginsberg notifications@github.com
wrote:

@clehene https://github.com/clehene have you had a chance to take a
look at the questions/comments above?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#4084 (comment).

@branan
Copy link
Contributor

branan commented Sep 8, 2015

@clehene I'm going to go ahead and close this for now since it's been inactive for a while. If/when you have time to pick it up feel free to re-open.

We'll keep the ticket open, since the general concept of following symlinks is a good enhancement request.

@branan branan closed this Sep 8, 2015
@clehene
Copy link
Author

clehene commented Sep 8, 2015

@branan Sorry I couldn't get back to this. I think closing for now is fine.
Thanks for pinging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants