Skip to content

Conversation

@jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Jul 13, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated workflow steps to improve the execution sequence for notebook processing in automated jobs.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 13, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The workflow configuration for running Jupyter notebooks in the CI pipeline was updated. The execution of flux start and papermill is now separated using flux start && papermill ... instead of running flux start as a prefix to papermill. This change was applied to all relevant notebook execution steps.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/pipeline.yml Modified notebook execution steps to run flux start and papermill as separate sequential commands using &&.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant CI Pipeline
    participant Flux
    participant Papermill

    CI Pipeline->>Flux: Run `flux start`
    Flux-->>CI Pipeline: Flux started (success)
    CI Pipeline->>Papermill: Run notebook with `papermill`
    Papermill-->>CI Pipeline: Notebook executed
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • Execute notebooks individually #617: Both PRs modify the .github/workflows/pipeline.yml file to change how Jupyter notebooks are executed in the CI pipeline, with the main PR refining the invocation of flux start before running papermill commands introduced in the retrieved PR.

Poem

🐇
In the pipeline’s gentle flow,
Flux now starts before we go.
Papermill waits, then takes its turn,
Ensuring jobs no longer burn.
Step by step, the scripts align—
CI hops in perfect line!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f6e96a2 and 3005aed.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pipeline.yml (2 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.91%. Comparing base (f6e96a2) to head (3005aed).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #728   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.91%   96.91%           
=======================================
  Files          30       30           
  Lines        1363     1363           
=======================================
  Hits         1321     1321           
  Misses         42       42           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the connect_commands branch July 13, 2025 15:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants