Numba fallback to object mode in more cases #1747
Merged
+107
−13
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ricardoV94
force-pushed
the
numba_fallback
branch
2 times, most recently
from
84019a8 to
d6b00d9
Compare
Member
|
Why draft? |
Member
Author
|
Something I want to clean further |
ricardoV94
force-pushed
the
numba_fallback
branch
from
d6b00d9 to
682a77a
Compare
Member
Author
|
Ready for review now @jessegrabowski |
jessegrabowski
approved these changes
Nov 27, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Spinoff from #811
Closes #1249
Closes #1245
Closes #1269
Missing test for the cython fallback, I forgot which Op was failing with it